The Effect and Long-term Prognosis of Different Suturing Methods for Meniscus Repair Under Knee Arthroscopy.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Wenjin Jin, Junxiao Cai
{"title":"The Effect and Long-term Prognosis of Different Suturing Methods for Meniscus Repair Under Knee Arthroscopy.","authors":"Wenjin Jin, Junxiao Cai","doi":"10.62713/aic.3607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and long-term prognosis of all-inside and outside-in suturing methods for meniscus repair under knee arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients with meniscus injuries who underwent surgical treatment at Yuhuan People's Hospital, Department of Joint Surgery, from January 2019 to March 2021. Based on the suturing method, patients were assigned into two groups: Group A (64 cases, all-inside suturing) and Group B (56 cases, outside-in suturing). Surgical indicators and adverse events were recorded for both cohorts. The variances in proprioception before and after surgery, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lysholm scores, knee range of motion (ROM), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A had significantly shorter operative time, postoperative immobilization, and hospital stay compared to Group B (p < 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse events was 12.50% in Group A and 16.07% in Group B, with no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). There were no substantial differences in preoperative knee proprioception difference values, IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, VAS scores, and knee ROM between the two groups (p > 0.05). At three months postoperatively, Group A exhibited lower proprioception difference values at 15°C, 45°C, and 75°C angles compared to Group B (p < 0.05). Additionally, at three months and three years postoperatively, Group A showed higher IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, and ROM and lower VAS scores compared to Group B (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the outside-in suturing approach, the all-inside suturing method for treating meniscus damage is more effective. It attenuates operative time, postoperative immobilization time, and hospital stay, ameliorates knee proprioception, promotes knee function recovery, alleviates pain, and is safe and reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 5","pages":"909-917"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and long-term prognosis of all-inside and outside-in suturing methods for meniscus repair under knee arthroscopy.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients with meniscus injuries who underwent surgical treatment at Yuhuan People's Hospital, Department of Joint Surgery, from January 2019 to March 2021. Based on the suturing method, patients were assigned into two groups: Group A (64 cases, all-inside suturing) and Group B (56 cases, outside-in suturing). Surgical indicators and adverse events were recorded for both cohorts. The variances in proprioception before and after surgery, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lysholm scores, knee range of motion (ROM), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were compared between the two groups.

Results: Group A had significantly shorter operative time, postoperative immobilization, and hospital stay compared to Group B (p < 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse events was 12.50% in Group A and 16.07% in Group B, with no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). There were no substantial differences in preoperative knee proprioception difference values, IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, VAS scores, and knee ROM between the two groups (p > 0.05). At three months postoperatively, Group A exhibited lower proprioception difference values at 15°C, 45°C, and 75°C angles compared to Group B (p < 0.05). Additionally, at three months and three years postoperatively, Group A showed higher IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, and ROM and lower VAS scores compared to Group B (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Compared to the outside-in suturing approach, the all-inside suturing method for treating meniscus damage is more effective. It attenuates operative time, postoperative immobilization time, and hospital stay, ameliorates knee proprioception, promotes knee function recovery, alleviates pain, and is safe and reliable.

膝关节镜下半月板修复术不同缝合方法的效果和长期预后
目的:本研究旨在评估膝关节镜下半月板修复全内缝合法和外侧缝合法的疗效和远期预后:对2019年1月至2021年3月在玉环市人民医院关节外科接受手术治疗的120例半月板损伤患者进行回顾性分析。根据缝合方法,将患者分为两组:A组(64例,全内侧缝合)和B组(56例,外侧缝合)。记录两组患者的手术指标和不良事件。比较了两组患者术前和术后本体感觉、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分、膝关节活动范围(ROM)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分的差异:结果:与 B 组相比,A 组的手术时间、术后固定时间和住院时间明显更短(P < 0.05)。A 组和 B 组的不良反应发生率分别为 12.50%和 16.07%,两组间无明显差异(P > 0.05)。术前膝关节本体感觉差值、IKDC评分、Lysholm评分、VAS评分和膝关节ROM在两组间无明显差异(P>0.05)。术后三个月时,与 B 组相比,A 组在 15°C、45°C 和 75°C 角度下的本体感觉差异值更低(P < 0.05)。此外,与 B 组相比,术后三个月和三年时,A 组的 IKDC 评分、Lysholm 评分和 ROM 均较高,VAS 评分较低(P < 0.05):结论:与外侧-内侧缝合法相比,全内侧缝合法治疗半月板损伤更有效。它缩短了手术时间、术后固定时间和住院时间,改善膝关节本体感觉,促进膝关节功能恢复,减轻疼痛,安全可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信