On theoretical and practical analyses of BDS-3/Galileo/GPS all-in-view and PPP time transfer with the consideration of satellite clock biases

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Dong Zhang, Fu Zheng, Meng Wang, Yuanhui Lin, Liangcheng Deng, Zhen Wang, Chuang Shi
{"title":"On theoretical and practical analyses of BDS-3/Galileo/GPS all-in-view and PPP time transfer with the consideration of satellite clock biases","authors":"Dong Zhang, Fu Zheng, Meng Wang, Yuanhui Lin, Liangcheng Deng, Zhen Wang, Chuang Shi","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01904-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Benefited from the advantage of high precision, wide area and low cost, the time transfer method based on precise point positioning (PPP) has become a popular technique for the remote clock comparisons. Although the time reference to which satellite clocks are referred can be eliminated by the difference between stations, the effect of satellite clock biases on the estimation of receiver clock offset is always ignored for PPP time transfer. Considering the PPP technique is extended from the all-in-view (AV) by the full use of precise carrier phase observables, a method to evaluate the effects of satellite clock biases on AV and PPP time transfer is proposed first. Then, the GPS, Galileo and BDS-3 time transfer results with different international GNSS Service (IGS) precise products are compared to verify the negative effects of satellite clock biases on AV and PPP time transfer. In our experiment, precise orbit and clock products provided by GFZ (German Research Centre for Geosciences), ESA (European Space Agency) and COD (Center for Orbit Determination in Europe) are used to obtain the clock comparison results of nine time links, including three short baselines, three medium baselines and three long baselines. The results show that the effects of satellite clock biases on AV and PPP time transfer are related to the magnitude of satellite clock biases and the baseline distance between stations. After removing the satellites with larger satellite clock biases, we assess the negative effects of satellite clock biases on AV and PPP time transfer for GPS, Galileo and BDS-3, respectively. By using GFZ, COD and ESA precise products for AV time transfer, the inconsistency of GPS and Galileo time transfer results caused by satellite clock biases is below 0.2 ns for long baseline. Due to the larger satellite clock biases for BDS-3, the inconsistency of BDS-3 AV time transfer results caused by satellite clock biases could reach 0.3 ns for medium baseline and even reach 0.9 ns for long baseline. For GPS and Galileo PPP time transfer, the inconsistency of time transfer results is below 0.05 ns for long baseline. However, the inconsistency of BDS-3 PPP time transfer results can only achieve 0.11 ns for medium baseline and 0.3 ns for long baseline. Thus, it is concluded that the satellite clock biases of BDS-3 precise satellite clock products need refining to improve the performance of BDS-3 PPP time transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01904-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Benefited from the advantage of high precision, wide area and low cost, the time transfer method based on precise point positioning (PPP) has become a popular technique for the remote clock comparisons. Although the time reference to which satellite clocks are referred can be eliminated by the difference between stations, the effect of satellite clock biases on the estimation of receiver clock offset is always ignored for PPP time transfer. Considering the PPP technique is extended from the all-in-view (AV) by the full use of precise carrier phase observables, a method to evaluate the effects of satellite clock biases on AV and PPP time transfer is proposed first. Then, the GPS, Galileo and BDS-3 time transfer results with different international GNSS Service (IGS) precise products are compared to verify the negative effects of satellite clock biases on AV and PPP time transfer. In our experiment, precise orbit and clock products provided by GFZ (German Research Centre for Geosciences), ESA (European Space Agency) and COD (Center for Orbit Determination in Europe) are used to obtain the clock comparison results of nine time links, including three short baselines, three medium baselines and three long baselines. The results show that the effects of satellite clock biases on AV and PPP time transfer are related to the magnitude of satellite clock biases and the baseline distance between stations. After removing the satellites with larger satellite clock biases, we assess the negative effects of satellite clock biases on AV and PPP time transfer for GPS, Galileo and BDS-3, respectively. By using GFZ, COD and ESA precise products for AV time transfer, the inconsistency of GPS and Galileo time transfer results caused by satellite clock biases is below 0.2 ns for long baseline. Due to the larger satellite clock biases for BDS-3, the inconsistency of BDS-3 AV time transfer results caused by satellite clock biases could reach 0.3 ns for medium baseline and even reach 0.9 ns for long baseline. For GPS and Galileo PPP time transfer, the inconsistency of time transfer results is below 0.05 ns for long baseline. However, the inconsistency of BDS-3 PPP time transfer results can only achieve 0.11 ns for medium baseline and 0.3 ns for long baseline. Thus, it is concluded that the satellite clock biases of BDS-3 precise satellite clock products need refining to improve the performance of BDS-3 PPP time transfer.

Abstract Image

考虑到卫星时钟偏差的 BDS-3/Galileo/GPS 全视图和 PPP 时间传输的理论和实践分析
基于精确点定位(PPP)的时间传送方法具有精度高、范围广和成本低的优点,已成为远程时钟比较的常用技术。虽然卫星时钟所参照的时间基准可以消除站点之间的差异,但 PPP 时间转移总是忽略卫星时钟偏差对接收器时钟偏移估计的影响。考虑到 PPP 技术是通过充分利用精确载波相位观测数据从全视角(AV)扩展而来的,因此首先提出了一种评估卫星时钟偏差对 AV 和 PPP 时间传输影响的方法。然后,比较了 GPS、伽利略和 BDS-3 与不同国际 GNSS 服务(IGS)精确产品的时间传递结果,以验证卫星时钟偏差对 AV 和 PPP 时间传递的负面影响。在我们的实验中,使用了由 GFZ(德国地球科学研究中心)、ESA(欧洲航天局)和 COD(欧洲轨道测定中心)提供的精确轨道和时钟产品,获得了九条时间链路的时钟比较结果,包括三条短基线、三条中基线和三条长基线。结果表明,卫星时钟偏差对 AV 和 PPP 时间传输的影响与卫星时钟偏差的大小和站点之间的基线距离有关。剔除卫星时钟偏差较大的卫星后,我们分别评估了 GPS、伽利略和 BDS-3 卫星时钟偏差对 AV 和 PPP 时间转移的负面影响。通过使用 GFZ、COD 和 ESA 的精确产品进行 AV 时间转移,卫星时钟偏差造成的 GPS 和伽利略时间转移结果的不一致性在长基线上低于 0.2 ns。由于 BDS-3 的卫星时钟偏差较大,由卫星时钟偏差引起的 BDS-3 AV 时间转移结果的不一致性在中基线时可能达到 0.3 ns,在长基线时甚至达到 0.9 ns。对于 GPS 和伽利略 PPP 时间转移,时间转移结果的不一致性在长基线时低于 0.05 ns。然而,BDS-3 PPP 时间转移结果的不一致性在中基线时只能达到 0.11 ns,在长基线时只能达到 0.3 ns。因此,结论是需要改进 BDS-3 精确卫星时钟产品的卫星时钟偏差,以提高 BDS-3 PPP 时间传送的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信