One-Stage Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Severe Septic Destruction of the Ankle Joint Using a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.

Foot & ankle international Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1177/10711007241283803
Joffrey Boucly, Pierre-Alban Bouché, Maria Dolores Bermudo Gamboa, Christophe Ménigaux, Alexandre Hardy, Thomas Bauer, Charles Pioger
{"title":"One-Stage Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Severe Septic Destruction of the Ankle Joint Using a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Joffrey Boucly, Pierre-Alban Bouché, Maria Dolores Bermudo Gamboa, Christophe Ménigaux, Alexandre Hardy, Thomas Bauer, Charles Pioger","doi":"10.1177/10711007241283803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe septic destruction of the ankle joint poses a therapeutic challenge but lacks a consensus optimal treatment. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is considered a valuable salvage procedure, but the literature remains scarce. Conventional treatment approaches, including 2-stage procedures, have been associated with prolonged recovery times and varying success rates. Many authors prefer classical external fixation in these scenarios, citing concerns that internal implants might pose a risk for recurrent infection. To date, no study has investigated the outcomes of 1-stage surgery using a retrograde intramedullary (IM) nail. The main purpose was to assess the rate of recurrent infection at 2 years following 1-stage TTCA using a retrograde IM nail in severe septic destruction of the ankle joint. Fusion rates and functional outcomes were evaluated as secondary purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical and radiologic data of patients who underwent 1-stage TTCA with retrograde IM nail following severe septic destruction of the ankle joint with a minimal follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. Reinfection rate, fusion rate, functional outcomes, and complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 42 months (24-92 months). The mean age was 55 ± 18 years old. At the last follow-up, reinfection occurred in 6 patients (24%) and fusion was obtained in 19 patients (83%). Eight patients (32%) required revision surgery. The mean postoperative modified American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were respectively 53 ± 19.5, 35.5 ± 11.4, and 46.7 ± 13.5 points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-stage TTCA with retrograde IM nail appears to be an acceptable alternative in severe septic destruction of the ankle joint, with a high eradication rate of infection and ankle fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":94011,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle international","volume":" ","pages":"1303-1309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007241283803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe septic destruction of the ankle joint poses a therapeutic challenge but lacks a consensus optimal treatment. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is considered a valuable salvage procedure, but the literature remains scarce. Conventional treatment approaches, including 2-stage procedures, have been associated with prolonged recovery times and varying success rates. Many authors prefer classical external fixation in these scenarios, citing concerns that internal implants might pose a risk for recurrent infection. To date, no study has investigated the outcomes of 1-stage surgery using a retrograde intramedullary (IM) nail. The main purpose was to assess the rate of recurrent infection at 2 years following 1-stage TTCA using a retrograde IM nail in severe septic destruction of the ankle joint. Fusion rates and functional outcomes were evaluated as secondary purposes.

Methods: The clinical and radiologic data of patients who underwent 1-stage TTCA with retrograde IM nail following severe septic destruction of the ankle joint with a minimal follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. Reinfection rate, fusion rate, functional outcomes, and complications were evaluated.

Results: A total of 25 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 42 months (24-92 months). The mean age was 55 ± 18 years old. At the last follow-up, reinfection occurred in 6 patients (24%) and fusion was obtained in 19 patients (83%). Eight patients (32%) required revision surgery. The mean postoperative modified American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were respectively 53 ± 19.5, 35.5 ± 11.4, and 46.7 ± 13.5 points.

Conclusion: One-stage TTCA with retrograde IM nail appears to be an acceptable alternative in severe septic destruction of the ankle joint, with a high eradication rate of infection and ankle fusion.

使用逆行髓内钉一期胫骨踝关节置换术治疗严重化脓性踝关节破坏:一项回顾性横断面研究。
背景:踝关节的严重化脓性破坏给治疗带来了挑战,但最佳治疗方法尚未达成共识。胫骨踝关节置换术(TTCA)被认为是一种有价值的挽救手术,但相关文献仍然很少。传统的治疗方法,包括两阶段手术,都存在恢复时间长、成功率不一的问题。许多学者担心内植入物可能会带来复发感染的风险,因此在这些情况下更倾向于传统的外固定。迄今为止,还没有研究调查过使用逆行髓内钉(IM)进行 1 期手术的结果。该研究的主要目的是评估在踝关节严重化脓性破坏的情况下使用逆行髓内钉进行 1 期 TTCA 术后 2 年的复发感染率。评估融合率和功能结果是次要目的:回顾性分析了在踝关节严重化脓性破坏后使用逆行IM钉进行1期TTCA的患者的临床和放射学数据,随访时间最短为2年。对再感染率、融合率、功能结果和并发症进行了评估:共纳入 25 名患者,平均随访 42 个月(24-92 个月)。平均年龄为 55±18 岁。在最后一次随访中,6 名患者(24%)发生了再感染,19 名患者(83%)完成了融合。8名患者(32%)需要进行翻修手术。术后改良的美国骨科足踝协会(AOFAS)评分、12项简表健康调查身体和精神部分的平均总分分别为53±19.5分、35.5±11.4分和46.7±13.5分:结论:对于严重化脓性踝关节毁损,使用逆行IM钉的一期TTCA似乎是一种可接受的替代方案,其感染根除率和踝关节融合率都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信