Beth Janetski , Patricia Wigle , Curtis G. Jefferson
{"title":"Best Practices for Assessing Problem-Solving","authors":"Beth Janetski , Patricia Wigle , Curtis G. Jefferson","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To explore best practices for the achievement and assessment of the problem-solving subdomain of the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Practice Activities in pharmacy education, including problem-solving, critical thinking, and creative thinking (innovative mindset).</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Measuring all 3 of these individual skills is challenging but tools and approaches exist in the literature. Common approaches include standardized instruments and validated rubrics for assignment design and performance assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Summary</h3><div>More work is needed in continuing to define and refine best practices in this area. It appears the coupling of standardized tools with the use of validated rubrics may be necessary to achieve accurate measurement of student achievement in this subdomain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 12","pages":"Article 101313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To explore best practices for the achievement and assessment of the problem-solving subdomain of the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Practice Activities in pharmacy education, including problem-solving, critical thinking, and creative thinking (innovative mindset).
Findings
Measuring all 3 of these individual skills is challenging but tools and approaches exist in the literature. Common approaches include standardized instruments and validated rubrics for assignment design and performance assessment.
Summary
More work is needed in continuing to define and refine best practices in this area. It appears the coupling of standardized tools with the use of validated rubrics may be necessary to achieve accurate measurement of student achievement in this subdomain.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.