Speech recognition technology in prehospital documentation: A scoping review

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Desmond Hedderson , Karen L. Courtney , Helen Monkman , Ian E. Blanchard
{"title":"Speech recognition technology in prehospital documentation: A scoping review","authors":"Desmond Hedderson ,&nbsp;Karen L. Courtney ,&nbsp;Helen Monkman ,&nbsp;Ian E. Blanchard","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The nature of paramedic workflows, where paramedics are responsible to provide care and chart concurrently, can result in incomplete or non-existent patient care reports on patient handover to the emergency department (ED). Charting delays and retrospective recollection of care may lead to patient information gaps, which can increase ED workload, cause care delays, and increase the risk of adverse events. Speech recognition documentation technology has the potential to produce complete patient care reports quicker and improve paramedic-to-ED handover. We performed a scoping review to determine paramedic perceptions and user requirements for speech recognition documentation technology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MEDLINE, Google Scholar, IEEE Explore, ProQuest, and CINAHL were searched from 2014 to March 2024. Criteria included studies focused on paramedics’ use or perceptions of speech recognition documentation technology. This review included studies conducted in the prehospital environment and adjacent agencies (i.e., ED, fire, police, military).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review identified eight articles that met inclusion criteria. All eight articles were small focus group-based studies in laboratory settings published on or after 2020. Five studies were conducted in the United States, two in Switzerland, and one in Japan. Of the eight studies, five recommended further live environment testing of the technology examined, and three underscored the importance of a user-centred design. The top user requirements for speech recognition adoption was hands-free use, noise reduction technology, battery life, and word accuracy. All eight studies recommended further research and development of speech recognition documentation technology in the prehospital workflow<strong>.</strong></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This scoping review has highlighted that while there is a growing interest in speech recognition documentation technology in the paramedicine workflow, more research is needed, especially with larger samples in a live environment. The user requirements and perceptions of speech recognition documentation technology in paramedicine must be better understood to design systems with high adoption rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 105662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624003253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The nature of paramedic workflows, where paramedics are responsible to provide care and chart concurrently, can result in incomplete or non-existent patient care reports on patient handover to the emergency department (ED). Charting delays and retrospective recollection of care may lead to patient information gaps, which can increase ED workload, cause care delays, and increase the risk of adverse events. Speech recognition documentation technology has the potential to produce complete patient care reports quicker and improve paramedic-to-ED handover. We performed a scoping review to determine paramedic perceptions and user requirements for speech recognition documentation technology.

Methods

MEDLINE, Google Scholar, IEEE Explore, ProQuest, and CINAHL were searched from 2014 to March 2024. Criteria included studies focused on paramedics’ use or perceptions of speech recognition documentation technology. This review included studies conducted in the prehospital environment and adjacent agencies (i.e., ED, fire, police, military).

Results

The review identified eight articles that met inclusion criteria. All eight articles were small focus group-based studies in laboratory settings published on or after 2020. Five studies were conducted in the United States, two in Switzerland, and one in Japan. Of the eight studies, five recommended further live environment testing of the technology examined, and three underscored the importance of a user-centred design. The top user requirements for speech recognition adoption was hands-free use, noise reduction technology, battery life, and word accuracy. All eight studies recommended further research and development of speech recognition documentation technology in the prehospital workflow.

Conclusion

This scoping review has highlighted that while there is a growing interest in speech recognition documentation technology in the paramedicine workflow, more research is needed, especially with larger samples in a live environment. The user requirements and perceptions of speech recognition documentation technology in paramedicine must be better understood to design systems with high adoption rates.
院前记录中的语音识别技术:范围审查。
目的:辅助医务人员的工作流程性质决定了辅助医务人员在提供护理的同时还要制作病历,这可能会导致在将病人移交给急诊科(ED)时出现病人护理报告不完整或不存在的情况。病历记录延误和护理回顾可能会导致病人信息缺失,从而增加急诊科的工作量,造成护理延误,并增加不良事件的风险。语音识别记录技术有可能更快地生成完整的患者护理报告,并改善护理人员与急诊室之间的交接。我们进行了一次范围审查,以确定护理人员对语音识别文档技术的看法和用户需求:方法:检索了 2014 年至 2024 年 3 月期间的 MEDLINE、Google Scholar、IEEE Explore、ProQuest 和 CINAHL。标准包括有关护理人员对语音识别文档技术的使用或看法的研究。综述包括在院前环境和邻近机构(如急诊室、消防、警察、军队)进行的研究:结果:综述确定了八篇符合纳入标准的文章。所有八篇文章都是在 2020 年或之后发表的实验室环境中进行的小型焦点小组研究。五项研究在美国进行,两项在瑞士进行,一项在日本进行。在这八项研究中,有五项建议对所研究的技术进行进一步的实际环境测试,有三项强调了以用户为中心的设计的重要性。用户对采用语音识别技术的首要要求是免提使用、降噪技术、电池寿命和文字准确性。所有八项研究都建议在院前工作流程中进一步研究和开发语音识别文档技术:本范围审查报告强调,虽然人们对辅助医疗工作流程中的语音识别文档技术越来越感兴趣,但还需要进行更多的研究,尤其是在现场环境中进行更大样本的研究。必须更好地了解用户对辅助医疗语音识别文档技术的要求和看法,才能设计出采用率高的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信