Biopsychosocial Approaches for the Management of Female Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Selina Johnson, Alison Bradshaw, Rebecca Bresnahan, Emma Evans, Katie Herron, Dharani K Hapangama
{"title":"Biopsychosocial Approaches for the Management of Female Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Selina Johnson, Alison Bradshaw, Rebecca Bresnahan, Emma Evans, Katie Herron, Dharani K Hapangama","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Current guidelines recommend biopsychosocial-informed treatment for chronic pelvic pain (CPP). The objective of this systematic review was to describe the available biopsychosocial approaches for the treatment of CPP, and the outcomes reported, to understand how guideline-recommended treatments can be applied.</p><p><strong>Search strategy: </strong>MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Emcare, AMED and Cochrane trial registries were searched (inception to 17 November 2023).</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>CPP Studies in women where the principal treatment modality was a biopsychosocial approach were included. Prospero registration: CRD42022374256.</p><p><strong>Data collection/analysis: </strong>Data extraction included study setting, population, study design, intervention characteristics and outcome measures and is described via a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 14 RCTs (871 patients) and identified four broad intervention categories (Acceptance Commitment Therapy n = 2, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy n = 6, Mindfulness-based approaches n = 2, and Physiotherapy-based interventions n = 4). Pain science education (PSE) and, exposure/engagement with valued activity were recognised as important aspects of treatment regardless of intervention type. The most utilised outcomes were pain reduction and emotional functioning, with all studies reporting improvements in these domains. Heterogeneity in outcomes prevented efficacy comparison. High risk of bias was identified in six studies (1/4 physiotherapy-based approaches, 2/6 CBT, 1/2 ACT and 2/2 mindfulness-based interventions).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBT and ACT-based biopsychosocial approaches were found effective in reducing pain and improving psychometric outcomes for CPP. Evaluation indicated PSE, and exposure/engagement in valued activity are important components of biopsychosocial management. Outcome heterogeneity needs to be addressed in future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":"266-277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17987","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: Current guidelines recommend biopsychosocial-informed treatment for chronic pelvic pain (CPP). The objective of this systematic review was to describe the available biopsychosocial approaches for the treatment of CPP, and the outcomes reported, to understand how guideline-recommended treatments can be applied.

Search strategy: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Emcare, AMED and Cochrane trial registries were searched (inception to 17 November 2023).

Selection criteria: CPP Studies in women where the principal treatment modality was a biopsychosocial approach were included. Prospero registration: CRD42022374256.

Data collection/analysis: Data extraction included study setting, population, study design, intervention characteristics and outcome measures and is described via a narrative synthesis.

Results: The review included 14 RCTs (871 patients) and identified four broad intervention categories (Acceptance Commitment Therapy n = 2, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy n = 6, Mindfulness-based approaches n = 2, and Physiotherapy-based interventions n = 4). Pain science education (PSE) and, exposure/engagement with valued activity were recognised as important aspects of treatment regardless of intervention type. The most utilised outcomes were pain reduction and emotional functioning, with all studies reporting improvements in these domains. Heterogeneity in outcomes prevented efficacy comparison. High risk of bias was identified in six studies (1/4 physiotherapy-based approaches, 2/6 CBT, 1/2 ACT and 2/2 mindfulness-based interventions).

Conclusions: CBT and ACT-based biopsychosocial approaches were found effective in reducing pain and improving psychometric outcomes for CPP. Evaluation indicated PSE, and exposure/engagement in valued activity are important components of biopsychosocial management. Outcome heterogeneity needs to be addressed in future trials.

治疗女性慢性盆腔疼痛的生物心理社会疗法:系统综述》(Biopsychosocial Approaches for the Management of Female Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review.
背景/目的:目前的指南推荐对慢性盆腔痛(CPP)进行生物心理社会学治疗。本系统性综述的目的是描述治疗 CPP 的现有生物心理社会方法以及所报告的结果,以了解如何应用指南推荐的治疗方法:检索了 MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、EMBASE、Emcare、AMED 和 Cochrane 试验登记处(开始至 2023 年 11 月 17 日):纳入以生物心理社会疗法为主要治疗方法的女性 CPP 研究。Prospero 注册:数据收集/分析:数据提取包括研究环境、研究人群、研究设计、干预特点和结果测量,并通过叙述性综合进行描述:综述包括 14 项 RCT(871 名患者),确定了四大干预类别(接纳承诺疗法 n = 2、认知行为疗法 n = 6、正念方法 n = 2 和物理治疗干预 n = 4)。无论干预类型如何,疼痛科学教育(PSE)和接触/参与有价值的活动都被认为是治疗的重要方面。最常用的结果是疼痛减轻和情绪功能,所有研究都报告了这些方面的改善。由于结果的异质性,无法进行疗效比较。6项研究(1/4项基于物理治疗的方法、2/6项CBT、1/2项ACT和2/2项基于正念的干预)存在高偏倚风险:结论:以 CBT 和 ACT 为基础的生物心理社会方法可有效减轻 CPP 患者的疼痛并改善其心理测量结果。评估表明,PSE 和暴露/参与有价值的活动是生物心理社会管理的重要组成部分。在未来的试验中需要解决结果异质性的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信