Developments in Advance Care Planning in Australia: Potential Opportunities and Roadblocks for an Increasingly Digital World.

IF 1.8 3区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s11673-024-10396-2

Casey M Haining

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Australia is committed to looking at ways to modernize its healthcare delivery further by integrating digital health. Advance Care Planning (ACP) is an area of healthcare that would likely benefit from further digitalization. However, while greater integration of technology in the delivery of ACP could help improve practices and lead to increased uptake, the extent to which this is achievable will be influenced, in part, by current approaches to ACP regulation. This article canvasses recent developments and trends in Australian law relevant to ACP and reflects on how these developments may impact the further digitalization of ACP.

查看原文本刊更多论文

澳大利亚预先护理规划的发展：澳大利亚预先护理规划的发展：日益数字化世界的潜在机遇与障碍》。

澳大利亚致力于研究如何通过整合数字医疗来进一步实现医疗服务的现代化。预先护理规划（ACP）是医疗保健领域中的一个领域，很可能会从进一步的数字化中受益。然而，虽然在提供 ACP 的过程中更多地整合技术有助于改善实践并提高使用率，但这一目标的实现程度将在一定程度上受到当前 ACP 监管方法的影响。本文概括了澳大利亚法律中与 ACP 相关的最新发展和趋势，并探讨了这些发展可能对 ACP 的进一步数字化产生的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学：伦理

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

8.30%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies