Wide Variation in Mitral Valve Repair Rates Among U.S. Surgeons: Analysis of Medicare Claims Data.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hanghang Wang, Chen Dun, Martin A Makary, Christi Walsh, Yi Fan, Emily Rodriguez, Deven Patel, Alice Zhou, Armaan Akbar, Glenn Whitman, James S Gammie
{"title":"Wide Variation in Mitral Valve Repair Rates Among U.S. Surgeons: Analysis of Medicare Claims Data.","authors":"Hanghang Wang, Chen Dun, Martin A Makary, Christi Walsh, Yi Fan, Emily Rodriguez, Deven Patel, Alice Zhou, Armaan Akbar, Glenn Whitman, James S Gammie","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mitral valve repair is the preferred treatment for primary mitral regurgitation, offering significant short- and long-term advantages over valve replacement. This study was designed to evaluate the contemporary national mitral valve surgery practice patterns, focusing on the impact of surgeon-specific factors, such as operative volume and years of practice, on repair rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data over a 3-year period (January 2020 to December 2022). Mitral valve procedures were identified using specific CPT codes. We excluded patients with active infective endocarditis, mitral stenosis, or a history of prior mitral valve repair or replacement. Multivariable binomial regression was used to assess the impact of surgeon-specific factors on repair rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 2,072 surgeons in 770 hospitals who performed 12,339 mitral valve operations, with an overall repair rate of 68.8%. The median number of mitral valve operations performed per surgeon during the three-year study period was 3 (IQR 2 - 7), and the median number of mitral valve repairs was 2 (IQR 1 - 5). A subset of 312 surgeons (15%) performed more than 10 mitral valve procedures each and over half (57%) of all repairs nationally. This subgroup's median repair rate was 77%, with significant variability within the group: 17% of surgeons had a repair rate below 50%, 59% had a repair rate between 50 - 90%, and 24% had a repair rate above 90%. Multivariable regression analysis indicated significant associations between repair rates and surgeon-specific factors, including surgical volume, years of practice, and region of practice. Each additional procedure was associated with a 1.5% average increase in repair rate likelihood (95% CI 1.2 - 1.8%, p < 0.001), and each additional year of practice was associated with a 1.4% average increase (95% CI 0.8 - 2%, p < 0.001). Regional differences were notable: surgeons in the South demonstrating lower repair rates (median 71%, IQR 55% - 85%) compared to those in the Northeast (median 78%, IQR 68% - 91%, p = 0.02) and Midwest (median 86%, IQR 63% - 92%, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has identified significant variability in mitral valve repair rates among surgeons treating Medicare beneficiaries. Notably, even among the surgeons responsible for most of these procedures, the variability in repair rates is pronounced. These findings suggest substantial opportunities to improve outcomes for patients undergoing mitral valve operations in North America.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mitral valve repair is the preferred treatment for primary mitral regurgitation, offering significant short- and long-term advantages over valve replacement. This study was designed to evaluate the contemporary national mitral valve surgery practice patterns, focusing on the impact of surgeon-specific factors, such as operative volume and years of practice, on repair rates.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data over a 3-year period (January 2020 to December 2022). Mitral valve procedures were identified using specific CPT codes. We excluded patients with active infective endocarditis, mitral stenosis, or a history of prior mitral valve repair or replacement. Multivariable binomial regression was used to assess the impact of surgeon-specific factors on repair rates.

Results: We identified 2,072 surgeons in 770 hospitals who performed 12,339 mitral valve operations, with an overall repair rate of 68.8%. The median number of mitral valve operations performed per surgeon during the three-year study period was 3 (IQR 2 - 7), and the median number of mitral valve repairs was 2 (IQR 1 - 5). A subset of 312 surgeons (15%) performed more than 10 mitral valve procedures each and over half (57%) of all repairs nationally. This subgroup's median repair rate was 77%, with significant variability within the group: 17% of surgeons had a repair rate below 50%, 59% had a repair rate between 50 - 90%, and 24% had a repair rate above 90%. Multivariable regression analysis indicated significant associations between repair rates and surgeon-specific factors, including surgical volume, years of practice, and region of practice. Each additional procedure was associated with a 1.5% average increase in repair rate likelihood (95% CI 1.2 - 1.8%, p < 0.001), and each additional year of practice was associated with a 1.4% average increase (95% CI 0.8 - 2%, p < 0.001). Regional differences were notable: surgeons in the South demonstrating lower repair rates (median 71%, IQR 55% - 85%) compared to those in the Northeast (median 78%, IQR 68% - 91%, p = 0.02) and Midwest (median 86%, IQR 63% - 92%, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: This study has identified significant variability in mitral valve repair rates among surgeons treating Medicare beneficiaries. Notably, even among the surgeons responsible for most of these procedures, the variability in repair rates is pronounced. These findings suggest substantial opportunities to improve outcomes for patients undergoing mitral valve operations in North America.

美国外科医生二尖瓣修复率的巨大差异:医疗保险索赔数据分析》。
目的:二尖瓣修复术是治疗原发性二尖瓣反流的首选方法,与瓣膜置换术相比具有显著的短期和长期优势。本研究旨在评估当代全国二尖瓣手术的实践模式,重点关注外科医生的特定因素(如手术量和从业年限)对修复率的影响:方法: 使用三年内(2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月)100% 的医疗保险付费服务报销数据进行回顾性分析。二尖瓣手术使用特定的 CPT 代码进行识别。我们排除了患有活动性感染性心内膜炎、二尖瓣狭窄或既往二尖瓣修复或置换史的患者。采用多变量二项式回归评估外科医生特异性因素对修复率的影响:我们确定了 770 家医院的 2072 名外科医生,他们共实施了 12339 例二尖瓣手术,总修复率为 68.8%。在为期三年的研究期间,每位外科医生进行二尖瓣手术的中位数为 3 例(IQR 2 - 7),二尖瓣修复的中位数为 2 例(IQR 1 - 5)。在 312 名外科医生(15%)中,有一个子集每人进行了 10 次以上的二尖瓣手术,占全国所有修复手术的一半以上(57%)。该分组的修复率中位数为 77%,组内差异显著:17%的外科医生的修复率低于 50%,59%的外科医生的修复率介于 50 - 90% 之间,24%的外科医生的修复率高于 90%。多变量回归分析表明,修复率与外科医生的特定因素(包括手术量、执业年限和执业地区)之间存在显著关联。每增加一次手术,修复率平均增加 1.5%(95% CI 1.2 - 1.8%,p < 0.001),每增加一年执业时间,修复率平均增加 1.4%(95% CI 0.8 - 2%,p < 0.001)。地区差异显著:与东北部(中位数为 78%,IQR 为 68% - 91%,p = 0.02)和中西部(中位数为 86%,IQR 为 63% - 92%,p = 0.04)的外科医生相比,南部外科医生的修复率较低(中位数为 71%,IQR 为 55% - 85%):本研究发现,在治疗医保受益人的外科医生中,二尖瓣修复率存在很大差异。值得注意的是,即使在负责大部分手术的外科医生中,修复率的差异也非常明显。这些研究结果表明,在北美接受二尖瓣手术的患者有很大机会改善治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信