Impact of School Gardens on Nutrition Education Among Limited-Income Communities in Alabama.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sofia O Sanchez, Katie Funderburk, Erin Reznicek, Sondra M Parmer, J B Hinnant
{"title":"Impact of School Gardens on Nutrition Education Among Limited-Income Communities in Alabama.","authors":"Sofia O Sanchez, Katie Funderburk, Erin Reznicek, Sondra M Parmer, J B Hinnant","doi":"10.1111/josh.13513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We sought to determine the impact of school gardens and nutrition education on student fruit and vegetable consumption from limited-income communities in Alabama.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Third grade students at 99 Alabama schools with and without gardens on-site were randomized to receive either nutrition education or to a wait-list control group. Multi-level models were used to assess the effects of treatment and control with and without school gardens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students attending schools with gardens demonstrated highest consumption of fruits and vegetables prior to treatment. Nutrition education alone translated into significant dietary improvements. Both gardens and education translated into greatest dietary improvements.</p><p><strong>Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: </strong>Devising financially accessible, practical, and culturally relevant ways to improve student health through garden and nutrition education may help improve student diet. Forming comprehensive Extension, SNAP-Ed, and school collaboration to support gardens, nutrition education, and healthy school policies and systems can be a way to support and sustain healthy student learning environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined gardening and nutrition education is associated with increases in fruit and vegetable consumption among majority rural, Southern students from limited-resource communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13513","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We sought to determine the impact of school gardens and nutrition education on student fruit and vegetable consumption from limited-income communities in Alabama.

Methods: Third grade students at 99 Alabama schools with and without gardens on-site were randomized to receive either nutrition education or to a wait-list control group. Multi-level models were used to assess the effects of treatment and control with and without school gardens.

Results: Students attending schools with gardens demonstrated highest consumption of fruits and vegetables prior to treatment. Nutrition education alone translated into significant dietary improvements. Both gardens and education translated into greatest dietary improvements.

Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: Devising financially accessible, practical, and culturally relevant ways to improve student health through garden and nutrition education may help improve student diet. Forming comprehensive Extension, SNAP-Ed, and school collaboration to support gardens, nutrition education, and healthy school policies and systems can be a way to support and sustain healthy student learning environments.

Conclusions: Combined gardening and nutrition education is associated with increases in fruit and vegetable consumption among majority rural, Southern students from limited-resource communities.

学校菜园对阿拉巴马州低收入社区营养教育的影响。
背景:我们试图确定学校菜园和营养教育对阿拉巴马州低收入社区学生水果和蔬菜消费的影响:方法:对阿拉巴马州 99 所学校的三年级学生进行随机分组,让他们接受营养教育或等待名单对照组。采用多层次模型来评估有无学校菜园的治疗和对照组的效果:结果:有花园的学校的学生在治疗前的水果和蔬菜消费量最高。仅营养教育就显著改善了饮食。菜园和教育对饮食的改善最大:通过花园和营养教育来改善学生的健康状况,可以帮助改善学生的饮食。形成全面的推广、SNAP-Ed 和学校合作,以支持园艺、营养教育和健康的学校政策和制度,可以成为支持和维持学生健康学习环境的一种方式:结论:园艺和营养教育的结合与来自资源有限社区的大多数南方农村学生水果和蔬菜消费量的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信