Nurses' adherence to ethical principles - A qualitative study.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Valery Wong, Norasyikin Hassan, Yoke Ping Wong, Sophia Yen Nee Chua, Shaliza Abdul Rahman, Mas Linda Mohamad, Siriwan Lim
{"title":"Nurses' adherence to ethical principles - A qualitative study.","authors":"Valery Wong, Norasyikin Hassan, Yoke Ping Wong, Sophia Yen Nee Chua, Shaliza Abdul Rahman, Mas Linda Mohamad, Siriwan Lim","doi":"10.1177/09697330241291159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing is regulated by a set of professional standards. Whilst many forms of ethics apply to nursing, the biomedical ethical framework is common, involving autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. In healthcare, nurses often encounter ethical dilemmas that require them to navigate conflicting ethical principles. However, how nurses adhere to these principles in such situations is unclear.</p><p><strong>Research aim: </strong>To explore how registered nurses adhere to ethical principles when dealing with ethical dilemmas at work.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>A qualitative descriptive study design.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>Between August and December 2023, 21 registered nurses were recruited from a teaching hospital through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured in-person interviews or online video conferencing. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach was employed to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>Interview participation was voluntary. Written consent was obtained before participation. Participants' real identities were replaced with pseudonyms. This study was approved by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The data analysis developed four major themes and 15 subthemes. The four major themes are \"Addressing the dilemma,\" \"Contemplating the principles and consequences,\" \"Coordinating for well-informed, ethical decision,\" and \"Self-reflecting and finding consolation.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study explains how nurses navigate and uphold ethical principles when caring for patients to the best of their ability. Fully adhering to ethical principles can be challenging for caring for actively dying patients. Further research can expound on nurses' experiences and adherence to ethical principles in complex clinical cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330241291159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241291159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing is regulated by a set of professional standards. Whilst many forms of ethics apply to nursing, the biomedical ethical framework is common, involving autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. In healthcare, nurses often encounter ethical dilemmas that require them to navigate conflicting ethical principles. However, how nurses adhere to these principles in such situations is unclear.

Research aim: To explore how registered nurses adhere to ethical principles when dealing with ethical dilemmas at work.

Research design: A qualitative descriptive study design.

Participants and research context: Between August and December 2023, 21 registered nurses were recruited from a teaching hospital through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured in-person interviews or online video conferencing. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach was employed to analyse the data.

Ethical considerations: Interview participation was voluntary. Written consent was obtained before participation. Participants' real identities were replaced with pseudonyms. This study was approved by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board.

Findings: The data analysis developed four major themes and 15 subthemes. The four major themes are "Addressing the dilemma," "Contemplating the principles and consequences," "Coordinating for well-informed, ethical decision," and "Self-reflecting and finding consolation."

Conclusion: This study explains how nurses navigate and uphold ethical principles when caring for patients to the best of their ability. Fully adhering to ethical principles can be challenging for caring for actively dying patients. Further research can expound on nurses' experiences and adherence to ethical principles in complex clinical cases.

护士遵守伦理原则的情况--一项定性研究。
背景:护理工作受一套专业标准的监管。虽然许多形式的伦理适用于护理工作,但生物医学伦理框架是常见的,涉及自主性、受益性、非恶意性和公正性。在医疗保健工作中,护士经常会遇到伦理困境,需要在相互冲突的伦理原则中游刃有余。研究目的:探讨注册护士在处理工作中的伦理困境时如何遵守伦理原则:研究设计:描述性定性研究设计:2023年8月至12月期间,通过目的性抽样从一家教学医院招募了21名注册护士。通过半结构化面谈或在线视频会议收集数据。采用布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析方法对数据进行分析:访谈参与是自愿的。参与前已获得书面同意。参与者的真实身份用假名代替。本研究获得了新加坡保健中央机构审查委员会的批准:数据分析形成了四大主题和 15 个次主题。这四大主题分别是 "应对困境"、"思考原则和后果"、"协调做出知情的伦理决定 "以及 "自我反省和寻求安慰":本研究解释了护士在尽其所能护理病人时如何把握和坚持伦理原则。在护理濒临死亡的病人时,完全遵守伦理原则可能具有挑战性。进一步的研究可以阐述护士在复杂的临床病例中的经验和对伦理原则的坚持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信