Comparison of denture space and patient satisfaction for neutral zone versus standard-designed digital dentures restoring mandibular resorbed ridges: A crossover randomized clinical trial.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sara Ibrahim Soliman, Abdelrhman Alaa Ali Nosair, Omar Abbas Al-Sadat, Omnia M Refai
{"title":"Comparison of denture space and patient satisfaction for neutral zone versus standard-designed digital dentures restoring mandibular resorbed ridges: A crossover randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Sara Ibrahim Soliman, Abdelrhman Alaa Ali Nosair, Omar Abbas Al-Sadat, Omnia M Refai","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare neutral-zone-designed and standard-designed digital complete dentures used to restore severely resorbed ridges through differential digital analysis of teeth arrangement position, shape of the polished surface, and assessment of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study applied a within-subject comparison of two denture forms: computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) dentures designed based on the bone-support concept (control group) and CAD-CAM dentures designed based on the neutral-zone concept (test group). Twelve completely edentulous patients exhibiting advanced ridge atrophy were recruited, and they were randomly assigned to use one of the two dentures before the other. A comparison between the two groups' virtual denture confines was conducted using \"Medit compare\" digital software. The average values of three-dimensional deviations between the two dentures at different regions were calculated. The \"patient denture assessment\" questionnaire was used to gauge participants' satisfaction with their dentures. The obtained scores were used to compare the two denture types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The position of the neutral zone was significantly shifted at the level of both denture teeth and denture base outer limits (p = 0.001). The greatest deviation was calculated at the region of the palatal polished surface followed by lingual flange contours, while the buccal flanges displayed the least deviations (p ≤ 0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed between patients' satisfaction with neutral zone and standard dentures regarding function and comfort, retention, and stability of lower dentures (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAD-CAM neutral-zone dentures have distinctly different anatomical confines that can be clinically correlated to their better impact on patient acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare neutral-zone-designed and standard-designed digital complete dentures used to restore severely resorbed ridges through differential digital analysis of teeth arrangement position, shape of the polished surface, and assessment of patient satisfaction.

Materials and methods: This study applied a within-subject comparison of two denture forms: computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) dentures designed based on the bone-support concept (control group) and CAD-CAM dentures designed based on the neutral-zone concept (test group). Twelve completely edentulous patients exhibiting advanced ridge atrophy were recruited, and they were randomly assigned to use one of the two dentures before the other. A comparison between the two groups' virtual denture confines was conducted using "Medit compare" digital software. The average values of three-dimensional deviations between the two dentures at different regions were calculated. The "patient denture assessment" questionnaire was used to gauge participants' satisfaction with their dentures. The obtained scores were used to compare the two denture types.

Results: The position of the neutral zone was significantly shifted at the level of both denture teeth and denture base outer limits (p = 0.001). The greatest deviation was calculated at the region of the palatal polished surface followed by lingual flange contours, while the buccal flanges displayed the least deviations (p ≤ 0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed between patients' satisfaction with neutral zone and standard dentures regarding function and comfort, retention, and stability of lower dentures (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: CAD-CAM neutral-zone dentures have distinctly different anatomical confines that can be clinically correlated to their better impact on patient acceptance.

比较中性区和标准设计的数码义齿修复下颌吸收脊的义齿空间和患者满意度:交叉随机临床试验。
目的:通过对牙齿排列位置、抛光表面形状和患者满意度评估的差异化数字分析,比较中性区设计和标准设计的用于修复严重吸收牙脊的数字化全口义齿:本研究对两种义齿形式进行了受试者内比较:根据骨支持概念设计的计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)义齿(对照组)和根据中性区概念设计的计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)义齿(试验组)。研究人员招募了 12 名完全无牙槽嵴的晚期萎缩患者,并随机分配他们先使用这两种假牙中的一种,然后再使用另一种。使用 "Medit compare "数字软件对两组患者的虚拟义齿范围进行比较。计算了两组义齿在不同区域的三维偏差平均值。使用 "患者义齿评估 "问卷调查参与者对义齿的满意度。所得分数用于比较两种假牙:结果:中性区的位置在义齿牙齿和义齿基托外缘的水平上有明显偏移(p = 0.001)。腭磨光面区域的偏差最大,其次是舌侧边缘轮廓,而颊侧边缘的偏差最小(p ≤ 0.05)。患者对中性区义齿和标准义齿在功能、舒适度、固位和下部义齿稳定性方面的满意度差异有统计学意义(p ≤ 0.05):CAD-CAM中性区义齿具有明显不同的解剖限制,这在临床上可以更好地影响患者的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信