Perceived Community Control in Adults with Acute Low Back Pain: A Community-Based Study.

3区 综合性期刊
Flavia P Kapos, Colleen A Burke, Adam P Goode
{"title":"Perceived Community Control in Adults with Acute Low Back Pain: A Community-Based Study.","authors":"Flavia P Kapos, Colleen A Burke, Adam P Goode","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21101310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability for individuals and societies globally. Prior investigations have predominantly centered around biological and psychological factors. Addressing social determinants is critical for enhancing the effectiveness and equity of pain interventions. We aimed to characterize social factors, sleep, and pain among adults with acute LBP, focusing on perceived community control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-based sample of adults with acute LBP was recruited from two cities in North Carolina, United States, and followed up at 3 months. We used descriptive statistics to characterize social factors, sleep, and pain, overall and by levels of perceived community control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 110/131 enrolled participants had data on perceived community control (lower scores indicate higher control). Overall, the median perceived community control was 14 (interquartile range [IQR] = 11, 15). People with high perceived community control also had, on average, higher perceived individual control, better-perceived neighborhood walkability, lower number of sites with bothersome comorbid pain, and higher sleep quality. A higher proportion of participants with high perceived community control were of male sex, White race, and had a higher socioeconomic position.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community control and related constructs may be further explored in future intervention development as potentially modifiable social factors that may reduce pain burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21101310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability for individuals and societies globally. Prior investigations have predominantly centered around biological and psychological factors. Addressing social determinants is critical for enhancing the effectiveness and equity of pain interventions. We aimed to characterize social factors, sleep, and pain among adults with acute LBP, focusing on perceived community control.

Methods: A community-based sample of adults with acute LBP was recruited from two cities in North Carolina, United States, and followed up at 3 months. We used descriptive statistics to characterize social factors, sleep, and pain, overall and by levels of perceived community control.

Results: In total, 110/131 enrolled participants had data on perceived community control (lower scores indicate higher control). Overall, the median perceived community control was 14 (interquartile range [IQR] = 11, 15). People with high perceived community control also had, on average, higher perceived individual control, better-perceived neighborhood walkability, lower number of sites with bothersome comorbid pain, and higher sleep quality. A higher proportion of participants with high perceived community control were of male sex, White race, and had a higher socioeconomic position.

Conclusions: Community control and related constructs may be further explored in future intervention development as potentially modifiable social factors that may reduce pain burden.

急性腰痛成人的社区控制感:一项基于社区的研究。
背景:腰背痛(LBP)是导致全球个人和社会残疾的主要原因。之前的研究主要围绕生物和心理因素展开。解决社会决定因素对于提高疼痛干预的有效性和公平性至关重要。我们旨在描述患有急性枸杞痛的成年人的社会因素、睡眠和疼痛的特征,重点是感知到的社区控制:方法:我们从美国北卡罗来纳州的两个城市招募了患有急性椎间盘突出症的成年人作为社区样本,并对其进行了 3 个月的随访。我们使用描述性统计来描述社会因素、睡眠和疼痛的总体特征以及感知的社区控制水平:共有 110/131 名参加者获得了感知社区控制的数据(分数越低,表示控制能力越强)。总体而言,感知社区控制力的中位数为 14(四分位数间距 [IQR] = 11,15)。平均而言,感知社区控制力强的人还具有较高的感知个人控制力、较好的邻里步行能力、较低的合并疼痛部位数量以及较高的睡眠质量。在社区控制感强的参与者中,男性、白种人和社会经济地位较高者的比例较高:结论:在未来的干预发展中,社区控制和相关结构可能会作为潜在的可改变的社会因素被进一步探索,从而减轻疼痛负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信