Cell Migration-Proliferation Dichotomy in Cancer: Biological Fact or Experimental Artefact?

IF 3.6 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Abdulaziz Alfahed
{"title":"Cell Migration-Proliferation Dichotomy in Cancer: Biological Fact or Experimental Artefact?","authors":"Abdulaziz Alfahed","doi":"10.3390/biology13100753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The migration-proliferation dichotomy (MPD) has long been observed in cultured cancer cells. This phenomenon is not only relevant to tumour progression but may also have therapeutic significance in clinical cancer. However, MPD has rarely been investigated in primary cancer. This study aimed to either confirm or disprove the existence of MPD in primary cancer. Using primary gastric, colorectal and prostate cancer (GC, CRC and PCa) cohorts from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, this study interrogated the MPD phenomenon by utilising RNA-Seq-based proliferation (CIN70 signature) and migration (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) indices, as well as gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA). Alternative hypothetical migration-proliferation models-The simultaneous migration-proliferation (SMP) and phenotype-refractory (PR) models-were compared to the MPD model by probing the migration-proliferation relationships within cancer stages and between early- and late-stage diseases using chi-square and independent T tests, z-score statistics and GSEA. The results revealed an inverse relationship between migration and proliferation signatures overall in the GC, CRC and PCa cohorts, as well as in early- and late-stage diseases. Additionally, a shift in proliferation- to migration dominance was observed from early- to late-stage diseases in the GC and CRC cohorts but not in the PCa cohorts, which showed enhanced proliferation dominance in metastatic tumours compared to primary cancers. The above features exhibited by the cancer cohorts are in keeping with the MPD model of the migration-proliferation relationship at the cellular level and exclude the SMP and PR migration-proliferation models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48624,"journal":{"name":"Biology-Basel","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13100753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The migration-proliferation dichotomy (MPD) has long been observed in cultured cancer cells. This phenomenon is not only relevant to tumour progression but may also have therapeutic significance in clinical cancer. However, MPD has rarely been investigated in primary cancer. This study aimed to either confirm or disprove the existence of MPD in primary cancer. Using primary gastric, colorectal and prostate cancer (GC, CRC and PCa) cohorts from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, this study interrogated the MPD phenomenon by utilising RNA-Seq-based proliferation (CIN70 signature) and migration (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) indices, as well as gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA). Alternative hypothetical migration-proliferation models-The simultaneous migration-proliferation (SMP) and phenotype-refractory (PR) models-were compared to the MPD model by probing the migration-proliferation relationships within cancer stages and between early- and late-stage diseases using chi-square and independent T tests, z-score statistics and GSEA. The results revealed an inverse relationship between migration and proliferation signatures overall in the GC, CRC and PCa cohorts, as well as in early- and late-stage diseases. Additionally, a shift in proliferation- to migration dominance was observed from early- to late-stage diseases in the GC and CRC cohorts but not in the PCa cohorts, which showed enhanced proliferation dominance in metastatic tumours compared to primary cancers. The above features exhibited by the cancer cohorts are in keeping with the MPD model of the migration-proliferation relationship at the cellular level and exclude the SMP and PR migration-proliferation models.

癌症中的细胞迁移与增殖二分法:生物事实还是实验假象?
人们很早就在培养的癌细胞中观察到了迁移-增殖二分法(MPD)。这种现象不仅与肿瘤进展有关,而且可能对临床癌症具有治疗意义。然而,MPD 在原发性癌症中很少被研究。本研究旨在证实或推翻 MPD 在原发性癌症中的存在。本研究利用癌症基因组图谱(Cancer Genome Atlas)和纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)的原发性胃癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌(GC、CRC和PCa)队列,通过基于RNA-Seq的增殖(CIN70特征)和迁移(上皮-间质转化)指数以及基因组富集分析(GSEA),探讨了MPD现象。通过使用秩方检验和独立T检验、z-score统计和GSEA探究癌症分期内以及早期和晚期疾病之间的迁移-增殖关系,比较了其他假定的迁移-增殖模型--同步迁移-增殖(SMP)模型和表型难治性(PR)模型--与MPD模型。结果显示,在 GC、CRC 和 PCa 群体中,以及在早期和晚期疾病中,迁移和增殖特征之间总体上呈反比关系。此外,在 GC 和 CRC 队列中观察到,从早期疾病到晚期疾病,增殖主导性向迁移主导性转变,但 PCa 队列没有发生这种转变,与原发性癌症相比,转移性肿瘤的增殖主导性增强。癌症队列表现出的上述特征符合细胞水平迁移-增殖关系的 MPD 模型,排除了 SMP 和 PR 迁移-增殖模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology-Basel
Biology-Basel Biological Science-Biological Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1618
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology (ISSN 2079-7737) is an international, peer-reviewed, quick-refereeing open access journal of Biological Science published by MDPI online. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications in all areas of biology and at the interface of related disciplines. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信