Pipeline Embolization device for the treatment of unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jorge Rios-Zermeno, Abdul Karim Ghaith, Carlos Perez-Vega, Elena Greco, Loizos Michaelides, Victor G El Hajj, Omar R Ortega-Ruiz, Jeyan S Kumar, Sukhwinder J S Sandhu, Rabih G Tawk
{"title":"Pipeline Embolization device for the treatment of unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes.","authors":"Jorge Rios-Zermeno, Abdul Karim Ghaith, Carlos Perez-Vega, Elena Greco, Loizos Michaelides, Victor G El Hajj, Omar R Ortega-Ruiz, Jeyan S Kumar, Sukhwinder J S Sandhu, Rabih G Tawk","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03040-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The pipeline embolization device (PED) is commonly used for intracranial aneurysm treatment. While its effectiveness for certain types of aneurysms is well-established, its efficacy for saccular aneurysms remains controversial. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of PED treatment for unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies with at least one year of follow-up after PED treatment for saccular aneurysms were included. The primary endpoint was angiographic aneurysm occlusion at long-term follow-up (≥ 12 months), and the secondary outcome was long-term complications. We conducted a meta-regression analysis to explore potential sources of heterogeneity across studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies of 797 patients with 963 aneurysms were included. Long-term angiographic occlusion rate was 85% (95% CI, 77-91%; p < 0.01), symptomatic ischemic stroke rate was 1% (95% CI, 0-3%; p < 0.01), rupture rate was 1% (95% CI, 0-2%; p = 0.02), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rate was 0.2% (95% CI, 0-1%; p = 0.11). Meta-regression analysis revealed a non-significant decreasing trend per year for aneurysmal occlusion, ischemic stroke rate, delayed aneurysmal rupture, and ICH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PED demonstrates high long-term occlusion and low complication rates, suggesting it is a safe and effective treatment option for saccular aneurysms. Additionally, newer devices exhibit reduced thrombogenic profiles and safety with decreasing trends in ICH, ischemic stroke, and delayed aneurysmal rupture.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03040-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The pipeline embolization device (PED) is commonly used for intracranial aneurysm treatment. While its effectiveness for certain types of aneurysms is well-established, its efficacy for saccular aneurysms remains controversial. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of PED treatment for unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies with at least one year of follow-up after PED treatment for saccular aneurysms were included. The primary endpoint was angiographic aneurysm occlusion at long-term follow-up (≥ 12 months), and the secondary outcome was long-term complications. We conducted a meta-regression analysis to explore potential sources of heterogeneity across studies.

Results: Eleven studies of 797 patients with 963 aneurysms were included. Long-term angiographic occlusion rate was 85% (95% CI, 77-91%; p < 0.01), symptomatic ischemic stroke rate was 1% (95% CI, 0-3%; p < 0.01), rupture rate was 1% (95% CI, 0-2%; p = 0.02), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rate was 0.2% (95% CI, 0-1%; p = 0.11). Meta-regression analysis revealed a non-significant decreasing trend per year for aneurysmal occlusion, ischemic stroke rate, delayed aneurysmal rupture, and ICH.

Conclusion: PED demonstrates high long-term occlusion and low complication rates, suggesting it is a safe and effective treatment option for saccular aneurysms. Additionally, newer devices exhibit reduced thrombogenic profiles and safety with decreasing trends in ICH, ischemic stroke, and delayed aneurysmal rupture.

用于治疗未破裂颅内囊状动脉瘤的管道栓塞装置:长期疗效的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介管道栓塞装置(PED)常用于治疗颅内动脉瘤。虽然它对某些类型动脉瘤的疗效已得到证实,但对囊状动脉瘤的疗效仍存在争议。我们旨在评估 PED 治疗未破裂颅内囊状动脉瘤的长期疗效:我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,纳入了PED治疗囊状动脉瘤后随访至少一年的研究。主要终点是长期随访(≥ 12 个月)时的血管造影动脉瘤闭塞情况,次要结果是长期并发症。我们进行了元回归分析,以探索不同研究间潜在的异质性来源:结果:共纳入了 11 项研究,797 名患者,963 个动脉瘤。长期血管造影闭塞率为 85%(95% CI,77%-91%;P 结论:PED 的长期闭塞率高、并发症发生率低,表明它是治疗囊状动脉瘤的一种安全有效的方法。此外,较新的设备显示出较低的血栓形成特征和安全性,ICH、缺血性中风和延迟动脉瘤破裂呈下降趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信