Thiol-SAM Concentration Effect on the Performance of Interdigitated Electrode-Based Redox-Free Biosensors.

Abstract

Despite the direct, redox-free and simple detection non-faradaic impedimetric biosensors offer, considerable optimizations are required to enhance their performance for the detection of various biomarkers. Non-faradaic EIS sensors' performance depends on the interfacial capacitance between a polarized biosensor surface and the tested sample solution. Careful engineering and design of the interfacial capacitance is encouraged to magnify the redout signal upon bioreceptor-antigen interactions. One of the methods to achieve this goal is by optimizing the self-assembled monolayer concentration, which has not been reported for non-faradaic impedimetric sensors. Here, the impact of alkanethiolate (cysteamine) concentration on the performance of gold (Au) interdigitated electrode (Au-IDE) biosensors is reported. Six sets of biosensors were prepared, each with a different cysteamine concentration: 100 nM, 1 μM, 10 μM, 100 μM, 1 mM, and 10 mM. The biosensors were prepared for the direct detection of LDL cholesterol by attaching LDL antibodies on top of the cysteamine via a glutaraldehyde cross-linker. As the concentration of cysteamine increased from 100 nM to 100 μM, the sensitivity of the biosensor increased from 6.7 to 16.2 nF/ln (ng/mL). As the cysteamine concentration increased from 100 μM to 10 mM, the sensitivity deteriorated. The limit of detection (LoD) of the biosensor improved as the cysteamine increased from 100 nM to 100 μM (i.e., 400 ng/mL to 59 pg/mL). However, the LoD started to increase to 67 pg/mL and 16 ng/mL for 1 mM and 10 mM cysteamine concentrations, respectively. This shows that the cysteamine concentration has a detrimental effect on redox-free biosensors. The cysteamine layer has to be as thin as possible and uniformly cover the electrode surfaces to maximize positive readout signals and reduce negative signals, significantly improving both sensitivity and LoD.