Kinematic Assessment of Upper Limb Movements Using the ArmeoPower Robotic Exoskeleton

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Anna Sophie Knill;Bettina Studer;Peter Wolf;Robert Riener;Michela Goffredo;Serena Maggioni
{"title":"Kinematic Assessment of Upper Limb Movements Using the ArmeoPower Robotic Exoskeleton","authors":"Anna Sophie Knill;Bettina Studer;Peter Wolf;Robert Riener;Michela Goffredo;Serena Maggioni","doi":"10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3486173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a neurological injury, neurorehabilitation aims to restore sensorimotor function of patients. Technological assessments can provide high-quality data on a patient’s performance and support clinical decision making towards the most appropriate therapy. In this study, the ArmeoPower, a robotic exoskeleton for the upper extremities, was used to assess 12 neurological patients and 31 non-disabled participants performing various standardized single joint and frontal plane game-like exercises. From the collected data, kinematic metrics (End-Point Error, Hand-Path Ratio, reaction time, stability, Number of Velocity Peaks, peak, and mean Velocity) and the game score, were calculated and analyzed according to three criteria: the reliability (a), the difference between patients and non-disabled participants (b), as well as the influence of robotic movement assistance (c). In total, 39 metrics were analyzed and the following five most promising assessment variables for different exercises could be identified based on the three above-mentioned criteria: smoothness (RainMug (wrist)), mean speed (RainMug (wrist)), reaction time (Goalkeeper), maximum speed (HighFlyer (elbow)) and accuracy (Connect the dots), with the former showing good validity (rho=0.82, p=0.02) when comparing to the patient’s severity level. The results demonstrate feasibility to extract and analyze various kinematic metrics from the ArmeoPower, which can provide quantitative information about human performance during training and therapy. The generated data increases the understanding of the patient’s movement and can be used in the future in clinical research for better performance evaluation and providing more feedback options, leading towards a more personalized and patient-centric therapy.","PeriodicalId":13419,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","volume":"32 ","pages":"3942-3952"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10734983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10734983/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After a neurological injury, neurorehabilitation aims to restore sensorimotor function of patients. Technological assessments can provide high-quality data on a patient’s performance and support clinical decision making towards the most appropriate therapy. In this study, the ArmeoPower, a robotic exoskeleton for the upper extremities, was used to assess 12 neurological patients and 31 non-disabled participants performing various standardized single joint and frontal plane game-like exercises. From the collected data, kinematic metrics (End-Point Error, Hand-Path Ratio, reaction time, stability, Number of Velocity Peaks, peak, and mean Velocity) and the game score, were calculated and analyzed according to three criteria: the reliability (a), the difference between patients and non-disabled participants (b), as well as the influence of robotic movement assistance (c). In total, 39 metrics were analyzed and the following five most promising assessment variables for different exercises could be identified based on the three above-mentioned criteria: smoothness (RainMug (wrist)), mean speed (RainMug (wrist)), reaction time (Goalkeeper), maximum speed (HighFlyer (elbow)) and accuracy (Connect the dots), with the former showing good validity (rho=0.82, p=0.02) when comparing to the patient’s severity level. The results demonstrate feasibility to extract and analyze various kinematic metrics from the ArmeoPower, which can provide quantitative information about human performance during training and therapy. The generated data increases the understanding of the patient’s movement and can be used in the future in clinical research for better performance evaluation and providing more feedback options, leading towards a more personalized and patient-centric therapy.
使用 ArmeoPower 机器人外骨骼对上肢运动进行运动学评估。
神经损伤后,神经康复旨在恢复患者的感觉运动功能。技术评估可以提供有关患者表现的高质量数据,为临床决策提供支持,帮助患者选择最合适的治疗方法。在这项研究中,使用上肢机器人外骨骼 ArmeoPower 对 12 名神经病患者和 31 名健全参与者进行了评估,他们在进行各种标准化单关节和额面游戏式练习时表现出色。根据收集到的数据,计算并分析了运动学指标(端点误差、手径比、反应时间、稳定性、速度峰值数、峰值和平均速度)和游戏得分,这些指标包括三个标准:可靠性(a)、患者和健全参与者之间的差异(b)以及机器人运动辅助的影响(c)。根据上述三个标准,总共分析了 39 个指标,并确定了以下五个最有希望用于不同运动的评估变量:平滑度(RainMug(腕部))、平均速度(RainMug(腕部))、反应时间(守门员)、最大速度(HighFlyer(肘部))和准确性(连线),其中前者与患者的严重程度比较显示出良好的有效性(rho=0.82,p=0.02)。结果表明,从 ArmeoPower 中提取和分析各种运动学指标是可行的,可以提供有关训练和治疗期间人体表现的量化信息。所生成的数据加深了人们对患者运动的了解,未来可用于临床研究,以更好地评估患者的表现,并提供更多反馈选项,从而实现更加个性化和以患者为中心的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
8.20%
发文量
479
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitative and neural aspects of biomedical engineering, including functional electrical stimulation, acoustic dynamics, human performance measurement and analysis, nerve stimulation, electromyography, motor control and stimulation; and hardware and software applications for rehabilitation engineering and assistive devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信