Feasibility and safety of flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvis pressure without urinary catheter: a retrospective study.

IF 1.7 3区医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY

BMC Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1186/s12894-024-01628-z

Huang Mei, Yang Baihua, Luo Xiaohua, Song Leming, Deng Xiaolin

{"title":"Feasibility and safety of flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvis pressure without urinary catheter: a retrospective study.","authors":"Huang Mei, Yang Baihua, Luo Xiaohua, Song Leming, Deng Xiaolin","doi":"10.1186/s12894-024-01628-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To explore the feasibility and safety of aflexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure(FUS-ICP) without a post-operative indwelling urinary catheter .Methods: In this retrospective study, we assessed patients with upper urinary tract stones who were treated with FUS-ICP at the Ganzhou People's Hospital from February 2022 to December 2023. Patients were divided into the non-urinary catheter (non-UC) and urinary catheter (UC) groups according to whether an indwelling catheter was used after surgery.Results: In total, 142 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the preoperative general data between the two groups. Patients in the non-UC group performed better than those in the UC group in terms of catheter-related bladder irritation (P = 0.001), the Sedation-Agitation Scale score (P = 0.012), and the numerical rating scale (P = 0.003). The incidences of urinary retention (P = 0.620), urinary tract infection (P = 0.529), and replacement of urethral catheter s (P = 0.438) in the UC group were inferior to those in the non-UC group, but there was no statistical significance.Conclusions: It is feasible and safe to perform FUS-ICP without a post-procedure indwelling urinary catheter.","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-024-01628-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To explore the feasibility and safety of aflexible ureteroscopy with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure(FUS-ICP) without a post-operative indwelling urinary catheter .

Methods: In this retrospective study, we assessed patients with upper urinary tract stones who were treated with FUS-ICP at the Ganzhou People's Hospital from February 2022 to December 2023. Patients were divided into the non-urinary catheter (non-UC) and urinary catheter (UC) groups according to whether an indwelling catheter was used after surgery.

Results: In total, 142 patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in the preoperative general data between the two groups. Patients in the non-UC group performed better than those in the UC group in terms of catheter-related bladder irritation (P = 0.001), the Sedation-Agitation Scale score (P = 0.012), and the numerical rating scale (P = 0.003). The incidences of urinary retention (P = 0.620), urinary tract infection (P = 0.529), and replacement of urethral catheter s (P = 0.438) in the UC group were inferior to those in the non-UC group, but there was no statistical significance.

Conclusions: It is feasible and safe to perform FUS-ICP without a post-procedure indwelling urinary catheter.

查看原文本刊更多论文

无需导尿管的智能控制肾盂压力的柔性输尿管镜检查的可行性和安全性：一项回顾性研究。

背景：探讨智能控制肾盂压力的柔性输尿管镜（FUS-ICP）的可行性和安全性：目的：探讨术后无需留置导尿管的智能控制肾盂压力的柔性输尿管镜（FUS-ICP）的可行性和安全性。方法：我们对2022年2月至2023年12月在赣州市人民医院接受FUS-ICP治疗的上尿路结石患者进行了回顾性研究：在这项回顾性研究中，我们对2022年2月至2023年12月在赣州市人民医院接受FUS-ICP治疗的上尿路结石患者进行了评估。根据术后是否使用留置导尿管，将患者分为非留置导尿管组（non-urinary catheter，简称UC）和留置导尿管组（urinary catheter，简称UC）：共有142名患者参与了研究。两组患者术前的一般数据无明显差异。就导尿管相关的膀胱刺激（P = 0.001）、镇静-镇痛量表评分（P = 0.012）和数字评分量表（P = 0.003）而言，非 UC 组患者的表现优于 UC 组患者。UC 组尿潴留（P = 0.620）、尿路感染（P = 0.529）和尿道导管更换（P = 0.438）的发生率低于非 UC 组，但无统计学意义：结论：在不使用术后留置导尿管的情况下进行 FUS-ICP 是可行且安全的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

177

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.