Methods to protein and peptide extraction from microalgae: a systematic review.

IF 1.1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0001-3765202420240113
Ariadne Tennyle V DE Souza, Karoline Mirella S DE Souza, Andreza P DE Amorim, Raquel P Bezerra, Ana Lucia F Porto
{"title":"Methods to protein and peptide extraction from microalgae: a systematic review.","authors":"Ariadne Tennyle V DE Souza, Karoline Mirella S DE Souza, Andreza P DE Amorim, Raquel P Bezerra, Ana Lucia F Porto","doi":"10.1590/0001-3765202420240113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, there is a demand for protein sources that do not use soil management or animal breeding. Among these sources we highlight the microorganisms, such cyanobacteria and microalgae, which have a simple growth using light, CO2, water and some mineral salts to generate high protein production. The extraction of these proteins depends on the method used. The most used methods for extracting bio-functional proteins are mechanical, chemical and enzymatic. The aim of this work is to analyze the protein extraction methods in microalgae using Scielo, ScienceDirect and NCBI (PubMed) electronic databases that made it possible to select original studies published in the last five years (2018-2023). A total of 2707 articles, 25 of which were selected for further analysis and subjected to risk of bias assessment. The genera Chlorella, Scenedesmus and Nannochloropsis were the most studied due to their high protein content. Mechanical methods and chemical hydrolysis are the most used methods, achieving an extraction yield of 46.0 % and 64.0 %, respectively. The best extraction results are obtained with a combination of methods, reaching up to 80.0 % yield. However, some aspects need to be observed to choose an ideal protein extraction method.</p>","PeriodicalId":7776,"journal":{"name":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","volume":"96 4","pages":"e20240113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202420240113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, there is a demand for protein sources that do not use soil management or animal breeding. Among these sources we highlight the microorganisms, such cyanobacteria and microalgae, which have a simple growth using light, CO2, water and some mineral salts to generate high protein production. The extraction of these proteins depends on the method used. The most used methods for extracting bio-functional proteins are mechanical, chemical and enzymatic. The aim of this work is to analyze the protein extraction methods in microalgae using Scielo, ScienceDirect and NCBI (PubMed) electronic databases that made it possible to select original studies published in the last five years (2018-2023). A total of 2707 articles, 25 of which were selected for further analysis and subjected to risk of bias assessment. The genera Chlorella, Scenedesmus and Nannochloropsis were the most studied due to their high protein content. Mechanical methods and chemical hydrolysis are the most used methods, achieving an extraction yield of 46.0 % and 64.0 %, respectively. The best extraction results are obtained with a combination of methods, reaching up to 80.0 % yield. However, some aspects need to be observed to choose an ideal protein extraction method.

从微藻中提取蛋白质和肽的方法:系统综述。
目前,人们需要不使用土壤管理或动物饲养的蛋白质来源。在这些蛋白质来源中,我们重点推荐蓝藻和微藻等微生物,这些微生物生长简单,只需利用光、二氧化碳、水和一些矿物盐就能产生大量蛋白质。这些蛋白质的提取取决于所使用的方法。提取生物功能蛋白质最常用的方法是机械法、化学法和酶法。这项工作的目的是利用 Scielo、ScienceDirect 和 NCBI(PubMed)电子数据库分析微藻中的蛋白质提取方法,从而选择过去五年(2018-2023 年)发表的原创研究。共筛选出 2707 篇文章,并对其中 25 篇进行了进一步分析和偏倚风险评估。研究最多的是小球藻属(Chlorella)、景天属(Scenedesmus)和南绿藻属(Nannochloropsis),因为它们的蛋白质含量很高。机械法和化学水解法是使用最多的方法,提取率分别为 46.0% 和 64.0%。综合使用多种方法可获得最佳提取效果,提取率高达 80.0%。不过,在选择理想的蛋白质提取方法时还需要注意一些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
347
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS) publishes its journal, Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (AABC, in its Brazilianportuguese acronym ), every 3 months, being the oldest journal in Brazil with conkinuous distribukion, daking back to 1929. This scienkihic journal aims to publish the advances in scienkihic research from both Brazilian and foreigner scienkists, who work in the main research centers in the whole world, always looking for excellence. Essenkially a mulkidisciplinary journal, the AABC cover, with both reviews and original researches, the diverse areas represented in the Academy, such as Biology, Physics, Biomedical Sciences, Chemistry, Agrarian Sciences, Engineering, Mathemakics, Social, Health and Earth Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信