Management strategies in rheumatoid arthritis

IF 29.4 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Victoria Konzett, Daniel Aletaha
{"title":"Management strategies in rheumatoid arthritis","authors":"Victoria Konzett, Daniel Aletaha","doi":"10.1038/s41584-024-01169-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved from simply the direct translation of drug efficacy results from clinical trials to patient care, to a more complex longitudinal process that considers not only drug efficacy but also the safety gestalt of a treatment and patient profiles and preferences, as well as health-economic factors. With numerous DMARDs available to treat RA, knowledge about trial efficacy becomes less important than data that inform an appropriate clinical strategy for their optimal selection and use. Overly ambitious approaches targeting the ‘maximum’ level of success could, for example, be prone to failure and create frustration, and lead to a large number of patients then being considered as ‘difficult to treat’. Safety profiles might be more informative than efficacy profiles for precision medicine approaches. Contemporary RA management strategies might therefore take a more holistic approach, beyond merely efficacy, to the setting of targets that lead to improved compliance rather than aspirational successes, with consideration of each patient’s multimorbidity profile and preferences, as well as the safety profile of each treatment. Ultimately, the goal remains unchanged: maximizing health-related quality of life; however, with a focus on optimal balance rather than superlatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":18810,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":29.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-024-01169-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved from simply the direct translation of drug efficacy results from clinical trials to patient care, to a more complex longitudinal process that considers not only drug efficacy but also the safety gestalt of a treatment and patient profiles and preferences, as well as health-economic factors. With numerous DMARDs available to treat RA, knowledge about trial efficacy becomes less important than data that inform an appropriate clinical strategy for their optimal selection and use. Overly ambitious approaches targeting the ‘maximum’ level of success could, for example, be prone to failure and create frustration, and lead to a large number of patients then being considered as ‘difficult to treat’. Safety profiles might be more informative than efficacy profiles for precision medicine approaches. Contemporary RA management strategies might therefore take a more holistic approach, beyond merely efficacy, to the setting of targets that lead to improved compliance rather than aspirational successes, with consideration of each patient’s multimorbidity profile and preferences, as well as the safety profile of each treatment. Ultimately, the goal remains unchanged: maximizing health-related quality of life; however, with a focus on optimal balance rather than superlatives.

Abstract Image

类风湿关节炎的管理策略
类风湿性关节炎(RA)的管理已从简单地将药物疗效结果从临床试验直接转化为患者护理,发展为一个更为复杂的纵向过程,不仅要考虑药物疗效,还要考虑治疗的安全性、患者情况和偏好以及健康经济因素。由于治疗 RA 的 DMARDs 种类繁多,有关试验疗效的知识已变得不那么重要,重要的是能为最佳选择和使用这些药物的适当临床策略提供依据的数据。例如,过于雄心勃勃地追求 "最大 "成功率的方法很容易导致失败和挫败感,并导致大量患者被视为 "难以治疗"。对于精准医疗方法而言,安全性分析可能比疗效分析更有参考价值。因此,当代的 RA 管理策略可能会采取一种更全面的方法,而不仅仅是疗效,以设定可提高依从性的目标,而不是期望的成功,同时考虑到每位患者的多病情况和偏好,以及每种治疗方法的安全性。归根结底,我们的目标始终不变:最大限度地提高与健康相关的生活质量;然而,我们关注的是最佳平衡,而不是夸夸其谈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Rheumatology
Nature Reviews Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
29.90
自引率
0.90%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Rheumatology is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals. The journal scope covers the entire spectrum of rheumatology research. We ensure that our articles are accessible to the widest possible audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信