Group empathy for pain is stronger than individual empathy for pain in the auditory modality.

Min Shao, Yulan Qiu, Yudie Zhang, Huiling Qian, Zilong Wei, Mingyu Hong, Shuqin Liu, Jing Meng
{"title":"Group empathy for pain is stronger than individual empathy for pain in the auditory modality.","authors":"Min Shao, Yulan Qiu, Yudie Zhang, Huiling Qian, Zilong Wei, Mingyu Hong, Shuqin Liu, Jing Meng","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsae074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans live in collective groups and are highly sensitive to perceived emotions of a group, including the pain of a group. However, previous research on empathy for pain mainly focused on the suffering of a single individual (\"individual empathy for pain\"), with limited understanding of empathy for pain to a group (\"group empathy for pain\"). Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the cognitive neural mechanisms of group empathy for pain in the auditory modality. The study produced group painful voices to simulate the painful voices made by a group, and recruited 34 participants to explore differences between their responses to group painful voices and individual painful voices using the event-related potential (ERP) techniques. The results revealed that group painful voices were rated with higher pain intensity, more negative affective valence, and larger P2 amplitudes than individual painful voices. Furthermore, trait affective empathy scores of the participants were positively correlated with their P2 amplitudes of group painful voices. The results suggested that the group empathy for pain may facilitate affective empathetic processing in auditory modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsae074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans live in collective groups and are highly sensitive to perceived emotions of a group, including the pain of a group. However, previous research on empathy for pain mainly focused on the suffering of a single individual ("individual empathy for pain"), with limited understanding of empathy for pain to a group ("group empathy for pain"). Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the cognitive neural mechanisms of group empathy for pain in the auditory modality. The study produced group painful voices to simulate the painful voices made by a group, and recruited 34 participants to explore differences between their responses to group painful voices and individual painful voices using the event-related potential (ERP) techniques. The results revealed that group painful voices were rated with higher pain intensity, more negative affective valence, and larger P2 amplitudes than individual painful voices. Furthermore, trait affective empathy scores of the participants were positively correlated with their P2 amplitudes of group painful voices. The results suggested that the group empathy for pain may facilitate affective empathetic processing in auditory modality.

在听觉模式下,群体对疼痛的共鸣强于个体对疼痛的共鸣。
人类生活在集体群体中,对群体的感知情绪(包括群体的痛苦)高度敏感。然而,以往对疼痛移情的研究主要集中于单个个体的痛苦(个体对疼痛的移情),而对群体对疼痛的移情(群体对疼痛的移情)了解有限。因此,本研究旨在研究听觉模式下群体对疼痛共情的认知神经机制。研究制作了群体痛苦的声音来模拟群体发出的痛苦声音,并招募了34名参与者,利用事件相关电位(ERP)技术探讨他们对群体痛苦声音和个体痛苦声音的反应差异。结果发现,与个体痛苦的声音相比,群体痛苦的声音具有更高的痛苦强度、更消极的情感价位和更大的 P2 振幅。此外,参与者的特质情感共情得分与他们对群体痛苦声音的 P2 振幅呈正相关。结果表明,对疼痛的群体共情可能会促进听觉模式下的情感共情处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信