Validation of a generic finite element vehicle buck model for near-side crashes.

Abstract

Objective: Finite element (FE) reconstructions of motor vehicle crashes using human body models are effective tools for developing a better understanding of occupant kinematics and injuries in real-world lateral crash conditions, but current near-side reconstruction methods are limited by the paucity of full-scale FE vehicle models. The objective of this study was to validate a generic vehicle model equipped with left-side airbags and intrusion capability by simulating a series of near-side crash tests for a range of vehicles and assessing model accuracy using objective evaluation methods.

Methods: Moving deformable barrier crash tests were reconstructed for five common vehicle classifications (compact passenger, mid-size passenger, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and van) using an updated version of a previously developed simplified vehicle model. Unknown vehicle and intrusion properties (pretensioner force, seatback airbag pressure, curtain airbag pressure, door panel stiffness, ratio of dynamic-to-static intrusion, intrusion velocity, and intrusion scaling factor) were estimated by parameterizing them across 224 simulations per crash test using a Latin hypercube design of experiments. Model accuracy was assessed for 13 anthropomorphic test device signals using the Correlation and Analysis (CORA) objective rating method and injury metric comparisons.

Results: Maximum ratings of 0.69, 0.67, 0.52, 0.52, and 0.62 were achieved for the compact passenger, midsize passenger, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and van classifications, respectively. On average, the abdomen displayed the most accurate behavior (0.51 ± 0.12), followed by the thorax (0.50 ± 0.10) and head (0.50 ± 0.07). The pelvis displayed the least accurate behavior (0.46 ± 0.18) of any region. Reconstructions overpraedicted injury metrics in all cases.

Conclusions: All vehicles achieved "fair" biofidelity ratings and the compact passenger and midsize passenger vehicles achieved "good" biofidelity ratings, validating them for kinematic evaluations with vehicle-to-vehicle nearside crash reconstructions. Regression models were developed for injuries and CORA ratings and can be used to optimize vehicle parameters in future studies.