Multiparameter computed tomography (CT) radiomics signature fusion-based model for the preoperative prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma nuclear grade: a multicenter development and external validation study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-35
Yingjie Xv, Zongjie Wei, Fajin Lv, Qing Jiang, Haoming Guo, Yineng Zheng, Xuan Zhang, Mingzhao Xiao
{"title":"Multiparameter computed tomography (CT) radiomics signature fusion-based model for the preoperative prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma nuclear grade: a multicenter development and external validation study.","authors":"Yingjie Xv, Zongjie Wei, Fajin Lv, Qing Jiang, Haoming Guo, Yineng Zheng, Xuan Zhang, Mingzhao Xiao","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The preoperative prediction of the pathological nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is crucial for clinical decision making. However, radiomics features from one or two computed tomography (CT) phases are required to predict the CCRCC grade, which reduces the predictive performance and generalizability of this method. We aimed to develop and externally validate a multiparameter CT radiomics-based model for predicting the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grade of CCRCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 500 CCRCC patients at The First, Second, and Yongchuan Hospitals of Chongqing Medical University between January 2016 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the training set (n=268), internal testing set (n=115), and two external testing sets (testing set 1, n=62; testing set 2, n=55). Radiomics features were extracted from multi-phase CT images, and radiomics signatures (RSs) were created by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. In addition, a clinical model was developed. A combined model was also established that integrated the RSs with the clinical factors, and was visualized via a nomogram. The performance of the established model was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) values, a calibration curve analysis, and a decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the four RSs and the clinical model, the RS-Triphasic had the best predictive performance with AUCs of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.91] and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95) in the training and testing sets, respectively, and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.93) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.93) in external testing sets 1 and 2. Integrating the RS-Triphasic, RS-corticomedullary phase (CMP), RS-nephrographic phase (NP), RS-non-contrast phase (NCP) with the clinical risk factors, a combined model was established with AUCs of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76-0.95), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70-0.94) for the training, internal testing, and external testing sets 1 and 2, respectively. The DCA indicated that the nomogram had a greater overall net benefit than the clinical and radiomics models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multiparameter CT RS fusion-based model had high accuracy in differentiating between high- and low-grade CCRCC preoperatively. Thus, it has great potential as a useful tool for personalized treatment planning and clinical decision making for CCRCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"14 10","pages":"7031-7045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-35","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The preoperative prediction of the pathological nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is crucial for clinical decision making. However, radiomics features from one or two computed tomography (CT) phases are required to predict the CCRCC grade, which reduces the predictive performance and generalizability of this method. We aimed to develop and externally validate a multiparameter CT radiomics-based model for predicting the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) grade of CCRCC.

Methods: A total of 500 CCRCC patients at The First, Second, and Yongchuan Hospitals of Chongqing Medical University between January 2016 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into the training set (n=268), internal testing set (n=115), and two external testing sets (testing set 1, n=62; testing set 2, n=55). Radiomics features were extracted from multi-phase CT images, and radiomics signatures (RSs) were created by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. In addition, a clinical model was developed. A combined model was also established that integrated the RSs with the clinical factors, and was visualized via a nomogram. The performance of the established model was assessed using area under the curve (AUC) values, a calibration curve analysis, and a decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: Among the four RSs and the clinical model, the RS-Triphasic had the best predictive performance with AUCs of 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.91] and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95) in the training and testing sets, respectively, and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72-0.93) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71-0.93) in external testing sets 1 and 2. Integrating the RS-Triphasic, RS-corticomedullary phase (CMP), RS-nephrographic phase (NP), RS-non-contrast phase (NCP) with the clinical risk factors, a combined model was established with AUCs of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76-0.95), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70-0.94) for the training, internal testing, and external testing sets 1 and 2, respectively. The DCA indicated that the nomogram had a greater overall net benefit than the clinical and radiomics models.

Conclusions: The multiparameter CT RS fusion-based model had high accuracy in differentiating between high- and low-grade CCRCC preoperatively. Thus, it has great potential as a useful tool for personalized treatment planning and clinical decision making for CCRCC patients.

基于多参数计算机断层扫描(CT)放射组学特征融合的透明细胞肾细胞癌核分级术前预测模型:一项多中心开发和外部验证研究。
背景:术前预测透明细胞肾细胞癌(CCRCC)的病理核分级对临床决策至关重要。然而,预测 CCRCC 分级需要一个或两个计算机断层扫描(CT)阶段的放射组学特征,这降低了该方法的预测性能和普适性。我们旨在开发并从外部验证一种基于多参数 CT 放射组学的模型,用于预测世界卫生组织/国际泌尿病理学会(WHO/ISUP)的 CCRCC 分级:本研究回顾性纳入了2016年1月至2022年5月期间在重庆医科大学附属第一医院、第二医院和永川医院就诊的500例CCRCC患者。患者被分为训练集(n=268)、内部测试集(n=115)和两个外部测试集(测试集1,n=62;测试集2,n=55)。从多相 CT 图像中提取放射组学特征,并通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归法创建放射组学特征(RS)。此外,还建立了一个临床模型。还建立了一个综合模型,将 RSs 与临床因素整合在一起,并通过提名图直观显示。使用曲线下面积(AUC)值、校准曲线分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估了所建模型的性能:结果:在四种 RS 和临床模型中,RS-Triphasic 的预测性能最好,其训练集和测试集的 AUC 值分别为 0.88 [95% 置信区间 (CI):0.85-0.91] 和 0.84 (95% CI:0.74-0.95),外部测试集 1 和 2 的 AUC 值分别为 0.82 (95% CI:0.72-0.93) 和 0.82 (95% CI:0.71-0.93)。将 RS-三相期、RS-皮质髓质期(CMP)、RS-肾图期(NP)、RS-非对比期(NCP)与临床风险因素相结合,建立了一个综合模型,其 AUC 为 0.92(95% CI:0.89-0.94)、0.86(95% CI:0.76-0.95)、0.84(95% CI:0.73-0.95)和 0.82(95% CI:0.70-0.94)。DCA表明,提名图的总体净效益高于临床模型和放射组学模型:基于多参数 CT RS 融合的模型在术前区分高分级和低分级 CCRCC 方面具有很高的准确性。因此,它很有可能成为 CCRCC 患者个性化治疗计划和临床决策的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信