Sinonasal Outcomes after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery in Patients With Cushing's Disease.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Nadeem R Kolia, Cara M Fleseriu, Subhanudh Thavaraputta, Pouneh K Fazeli, Paul A Gardner, Carl H Snyderman, Eric W Wang
{"title":"Sinonasal Outcomes after Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery in Patients With Cushing's Disease.","authors":"Nadeem R Kolia, Cara M Fleseriu, Subhanudh Thavaraputta, Pouneh K Fazeli, Paul A Gardner, Carl H Snyderman, Eric W Wang","doi":"10.1177/00034894241290978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has become the preferred treatment for pituitary tumors, with minimal sinonasal morbidity. However, patients with Cushing's disease (CD) may represent a subgroup with prolonged impairment of sinonasal quality of life (QOL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients with CD who underwent EEA at our institution. Control patients with non-functional tumors were matched by age, gender, and extent of EEA. The primary outcome was post-operative 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients with CD met the selection criteria and 20 controls were selected for comparison. Nine of the CD patients achieved persistent endocrinologic remission post-operatively. Comparing the CD and control groups, there was no difference in post-operative SNOT-22 score at 1 or 3 months. At 6 months, SNOT-22 scores were significantly worse in the CD group (27.4 ± 21.6 vs. 2.8 ± 2.3, <i>P</i> = .039). SNOT-22 scores improved to normal from 1 to 6 months in the control cohort (<i>P</i> = .007), but not in the Cushing's group (<i>P</i> = .726). Morbidity was present across all SNOT-22 domains, but was highest in the sleep domain (<i>P</i> = .023). Only morbidity in the facial domain improved over time (<i>P</i> = .032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with CD have significantly prolonged postoperative sinonasal QOL impairment following EEA compared to patients with non-functioning tumors, who normalize within 6 months. In CD patients, only morbidity in the facial domain, likely related to post-operative pain and nasal packing, improved over time, while the sleep domain was the most affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241290978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has become the preferred treatment for pituitary tumors, with minimal sinonasal morbidity. However, patients with Cushing's disease (CD) may represent a subgroup with prolonged impairment of sinonasal quality of life (QOL).

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with CD who underwent EEA at our institution. Control patients with non-functional tumors were matched by age, gender, and extent of EEA. The primary outcome was post-operative 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores.

Results: Ten patients with CD met the selection criteria and 20 controls were selected for comparison. Nine of the CD patients achieved persistent endocrinologic remission post-operatively. Comparing the CD and control groups, there was no difference in post-operative SNOT-22 score at 1 or 3 months. At 6 months, SNOT-22 scores were significantly worse in the CD group (27.4 ± 21.6 vs. 2.8 ± 2.3, P = .039). SNOT-22 scores improved to normal from 1 to 6 months in the control cohort (P = .007), but not in the Cushing's group (P = .726). Morbidity was present across all SNOT-22 domains, but was highest in the sleep domain (P = .023). Only morbidity in the facial domain improved over time (P = .032).

Conclusions: Patients with CD have significantly prolonged postoperative sinonasal QOL impairment following EEA compared to patients with non-functioning tumors, who normalize within 6 months. In CD patients, only morbidity in the facial domain, likely related to post-operative pain and nasal packing, improved over time, while the sleep domain was the most affected.

库欣病患者接受内窥镜垂体手术后的鼻窦效果。
目的:内镜下鼻窦方法(EEA)已成为垂体瘤的首选治疗方法,其鼻窦发病率极低。然而,库欣病(CD)患者可能是鼻窦生活质量(QOL)长期受损的一个亚群体:方法:我们回顾性地识别了在本院接受 EEA 的 CD 患者。方法:我们对在本院接受 EEA 的 CD 患者进行了回顾性研究,并根据患者的年龄、性别和 EEA 的范围匹配了无功能性肿瘤的对照组患者。主要结果是术后22项鼻功能测试(SNOT-22)评分:结果:10 名 CD 患者符合选择标准,20 名对照组患者进行了比较。其中九名 CD 患者术后内分泌持续缓解。对比 CD 组和对照组,术后 1 个月或 3 个月的 SNOT-22 评分没有差异。6 个月时,CD 组的 SNOT-22 评分明显降低(27.4 ± 21.6 vs. 2.8 ± 2.3,P = .039)。对照组的SNOT-22评分在1至6个月后恢复正常(P = .007),而库欣病患者组的评分则未恢复正常(P = .726)。SNOT-22的所有领域都存在发病率,但睡眠领域的发病率最高(P = .023)。随着时间的推移,只有面部领域的发病率有所改善(P = .032):结论:与在6个月内恢复正常的无功能肿瘤患者相比,CD患者在EEA术后鼻窦QOL受损时间明显延长。在 CD 患者中,只有面部领域的发病率(可能与术后疼痛和鼻腔填塞有关)随着时间的推移有所改善,而睡眠领域受到的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信