Strategy, Morality, Courage: Bioethics and Health Law after Dobbs.

IF 1.6 4区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1017/jme.2024.104

Nancy M P King, Christine Nero Coughlin, Beverly J Levine

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our paper examines what is required to protect and promote effective public discussion and policy development in the current climate of divisive disagreement about many public policy questions. We use abortion as a case example precisely because it is morally fraught. We first consider the changes made by Dobbs, as well as those which led up to the Dobbs decision, accompany it, and follow from it.

查看原文本刊更多论文

战略、道德、勇气：多布斯之后的生命伦理学和卫生法》。

我们的论文探讨了在当前许多公共政策问题存在分歧的情况下，如何保护和促进有效的公共讨论和政策制定。我们以堕胎为例，正是因为它在道德上充满争议。我们首先考虑了多布斯做出的改变，以及多布斯决定的前因后果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学：法

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.