Rethinking Health Law Architecture.

IF 1.6 4区哲学 Q2 ETHICS

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1017/jme.2024.103

Ani B Satz

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neither the individualistic regulatory health paradigm nor the vulnerable populations approach of public health can provide the legal structure necessary to address the most pressing problems in health care today. These approaches fail to address conflicts between individuals and populations as well as challenges to qualifying for care and are in inherent conflict with each other, sometimes within the same statute. As health concerns become more global, it is necessary to move past a vulnerable populations approach to a broader population approach that respects individual choice but does not sacrifice community health for liberty interests.

查看原文本刊更多论文

反思卫生法架构。

无论是个人主义的健康监管模式还是公共卫生的弱势群体方法，都无法提供必要的法律结构来解决当今医疗保健领域最紧迫的问题。这些方法无法解决个人与人群之间的冲突，也无法应对医疗资格方面的挑战，两者之间存在固有的冲突，有时甚至在同一法规中存在冲突。随着健康问题变得更加全球化，有必要从弱势人群方法转向更广泛的人群方法，这种方法既尊重个人选择，又不会为了自由利益而牺牲社区健康。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学：法

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

4.80%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.