Evaluation of the new modified apnea test in confirmation of brain death.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_913_22
Parviz Kashefi, Saeed Abbasi, Koosha Kiani, Maryam Khalifehsoltani Khajoei, Mojtaba Akbari
{"title":"Evaluation of the new modified apnea test in confirmation of brain death.","authors":"Parviz Kashefi, Saeed Abbasi, Koosha Kiani, Maryam Khalifehsoltani Khajoei, Mojtaba Akbari","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_913_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Apnea testing is mandatory to confirm brain death; however, it is unsafe for patients who have substantial hypoxemia without ventilator support. We used a new modified apnea test without the need to disconnect the patient from the ventilator in the present study and compared the outcomes and complications of the new method to the widely used old method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The current study was conducted on people suspected of having brain death. Both the old and new apnea tests were carried out on the same individual. In the new modified method, instead of hyperventilating and then separating the brain death from the ventilator, the induced hypercapnia method was used, and instead of performing repeated arterial blood gas (ABG), the target ETCO<sub>2</sub> was obtained, and at the time of the target ETCO<sub>2</sub>, ABG was also checked followed by comparing ETCO<sub>2</sub> with PaCO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients, including 25 (83.3%) males and 5 (16.75%) females, were included in the study. The results showed significant improvement in terms of O<sub>2</sub> saturation and heart rate (HR) using the new modified apnea test compared to the common test. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and the frequency of complications were improved in the new modified test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified apnea test produced better results in terms of O<sub>2</sub> saturation, HR, and other clinical factors, while it does not require disconnection from the ventilator and repeated ABG assessment. Therefore, it can be used to successfully diagnose brain death in high-risk individuals suffering from severe hypoxia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"29 ","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_913_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Apnea testing is mandatory to confirm brain death; however, it is unsafe for patients who have substantial hypoxemia without ventilator support. We used a new modified apnea test without the need to disconnect the patient from the ventilator in the present study and compared the outcomes and complications of the new method to the widely used old method.

Materials and methods: The current study was conducted on people suspected of having brain death. Both the old and new apnea tests were carried out on the same individual. In the new modified method, instead of hyperventilating and then separating the brain death from the ventilator, the induced hypercapnia method was used, and instead of performing repeated arterial blood gas (ABG), the target ETCO2 was obtained, and at the time of the target ETCO2, ABG was also checked followed by comparing ETCO2 with PaCO2.

Results: Thirty patients, including 25 (83.3%) males and 5 (16.75%) females, were included in the study. The results showed significant improvement in terms of O2 saturation and heart rate (HR) using the new modified apnea test compared to the common test. Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and the frequency of complications were improved in the new modified test.

Conclusion: The modified apnea test produced better results in terms of O2 saturation, HR, and other clinical factors, while it does not require disconnection from the ventilator and repeated ABG assessment. Therefore, it can be used to successfully diagnose brain death in high-risk individuals suffering from severe hypoxia.

评估用于确认脑死亡的新型改良呼吸暂停试验。
背景:呼吸暂停测试是确认脑死亡的必备条件;然而,对于没有呼吸机支持的严重低氧血症患者来说,这种测试并不安全。在本研究中,我们使用了一种新的改良呼吸暂停测试方法,无需让患者脱离呼吸机,并比较了新方法与广泛使用的旧方法的结果和并发症:本次研究的对象是脑死亡疑似患者。新旧呼吸暂停测试均在同一人身上进行。在改良后的新方法中,使用了诱导高碳酸血症法,而不是过度通气,然后将脑死亡患者与呼吸机分离,也不是重复进行动脉血气(ABG),而是获得目标 ETCO2,在获得目标 ETCO2 时,还要检查 ABG,然后比较 ETCO2 和 PaCO2:研究共纳入 30 名患者,其中男性 25 名(83.3%),女性 5 名(16.75%)。结果显示,与普通测试相比,使用新的改良呼吸暂停测试,患者的氧气饱和度和心率(HR)均有明显改善。结论:结论:改良的呼吸暂停测试在氧气饱和度、心率和其他临床因素方面取得了更好的结果,同时无需断开呼吸机和重复 ABG 评估。因此,它可用于成功诊断严重缺氧的高危人群的脑死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信