AI discernment in foot and ankle surgery research: A survey investigation.

IF 1.9 3区医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS

Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2024.10.001

Steven R Cooperman, Abisola Olaniyan, Roberto A Brandão

{"title":"AI discernment in foot and ankle surgery research: A survey investigation.","authors":"Steven R Cooperman, Abisola Olaniyan, Roberto A Brandão","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study evaluated the ability to differentiate between AI-generated and human-authored abstracts in foot and ankle surgery.Methods: An AI system (ChatGPT 3.0) was trained on 21 published abstracts to create six novel case abstracts. Nine foot and ankle surgeons participated in a blinded survey, tasked with distinguishing AI-generated from human-written abstracts, rating their confidence in their responses. Surveys were completed twice at two different time points to evaluate intra-/inter-observer reliability.Results: The overall accuracy rate for distinguishing AI-generated from human-written abstracts was 50.5 % (n = 109/216), indicating no better performance than random chance. Reviewer experience and AI familiarity did not significantly affect accuracy. Inter-rater reliability was moderate initially but decreased over time, and intra-rater reliability was poor.Conclusions: In their current form, AI-generated abstracts are nearly indistinguishable from human-written ones, posing challenges for consistent identification in foot and ankle surgery.Level of evidence: IV.","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.10.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the ability to differentiate between AI-generated and human-authored abstracts in foot and ankle surgery.

Methods: An AI system (ChatGPT 3.0) was trained on 21 published abstracts to create six novel case abstracts. Nine foot and ankle surgeons participated in a blinded survey, tasked with distinguishing AI-generated from human-written abstracts, rating their confidence in their responses. Surveys were completed twice at two different time points to evaluate intra-/inter-observer reliability.

Results: The overall accuracy rate for distinguishing AI-generated from human-written abstracts was 50.5 % (n = 109/216), indicating no better performance than random chance. Reviewer experience and AI familiarity did not significantly affect accuracy. Inter-rater reliability was moderate initially but decreased over time, and intra-rater reliability was poor.

Conclusions: In their current form, AI-generated abstracts are nearly indistinguishable from human-written ones, posing challenges for consistent identification in foot and ankle surgery.

Level of evidence: IV.

查看原文本刊更多论文

足踝外科研究中的人工智能识别：调查研究。

背景本研究评估了区分人工智能生成的足踝外科摘要和人类撰写的足踝外科摘要的能力：人工智能系统（ChatGPT 3.0）在 21 篇已发表摘要的基础上进行训练，创建了 6 篇新颖的病例摘要。九名足踝外科医生参与了一项盲法调查，任务是区分人工智能生成的摘要和人类撰写的摘要，并对他们的回答进行信心评级。调查在两个不同的时间点完成两次，以评估观察者内部/观察者之间的可靠性：区分人工智能生成的摘要和人类撰写的摘要的总体准确率为 50.5%（n = 109/216），这表明两者之间的差异并不大。审稿人的经验和对人工智能的熟悉程度对准确率没有明显影响。评阅者之间的可靠性最初为中等，但随着时间的推移有所下降，评阅者内部的可靠性较差：结论：在目前的形式下，人工智能生成的摘要与人类撰写的摘要几乎没有区别，这给足踝外科手术中的一致识别带来了挑战：证据等级：IV。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

16.00%

发文量

202

期刊介绍： Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.