Predictive Processing, Rational Constructivism, and Bayesian Models of Development: Commentary.

IF 2.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Topics in Cognitive Science Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1111/tops.12759

Andrew Perfors

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a commentary for a special issue on predictive processing and rational constructivist models of development. Mainly I use the opportunity to ask a bunch of questions about what these theoretical frameworks show us (and what they do not) and mostly where the open questions still are. To get meta for a moment, I thought these questions were the best way to maximize the value of my commentary: They have the highest probability of leading to the most uncertainty reduction for our field in the long term. Please read in that spirit.

查看原文本刊更多论文

预测处理、理性建构主义和贝叶斯发展模型：评论。

这是一篇为预测性加工和理性建构主义发展模式特刊撰写的评论。我主要是想借此机会就这些理论框架向我们展示了什么（以及它们没有展示什么），以及主要是哪些地方仍存在开放性问题提出一系列问题。说得玄一点，我认为这些问题是让我的评论价值最大化的最佳方式：从长远来看，这些问题最有可能为我们的领域减少最大的不确定性。请本着这种精神阅读。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Topics in Cognitive Science PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

8.50

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Topics in Cognitive Science (topiCS) is an innovative new journal that covers all areas of cognitive science including cognitive modeling, cognitive neuroscience, cognitive anthropology, and cognitive science and philosophy. topiCS aims to provide a forum for: -New communities of researchers- New controversies in established areas- Debates and commentaries- Reflections and integration The publication features multiple scholarly papers dedicated to a single topic. Some of these topics will appear together in one issue, but others may appear across several issues or develop into a regular feature. Controversies or debates started in one issue may be followed up by commentaries in a later issue, etc. However, the format and origin of the topics will vary greatly.