The gaming disorder test and gaming disorder scale for adolescents: translation and validation among Vietnamese young adults.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kamolthip Ruckwongpatr, Yu-Han Lee, Ngoc Dang Tran, Le An Pham, Mark D Griffiths, Amir H Pakpour, Cheng-Kuan Lin, Yu-Ting Huang, Jung-Sheng Chen, Sio-Meng Lei, Chung-Ying Lin
{"title":"The gaming disorder test and gaming disorder scale for adolescents: translation and validation among Vietnamese young adults.","authors":"Kamolthip Ruckwongpatr, Yu-Han Lee, Ngoc Dang Tran, Le An Pham, Mark D Griffiths, Amir H Pakpour, Cheng-Kuan Lin, Yu-Ting Huang, Jung-Sheng Chen, Sio-Meng Lei, Chung-Ying Lin","doi":"10.1186/s41155-024-00328-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown that the Gaming Disorder Test (GDT) and Gaming Disorder Scale for Adolescents (GADIS-A) have promising validity and reliability when assessing symptoms of gaming disorder among young adults. However, validity and reliability properties of the two scales have not been established among a Vietnamese population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study translated the GDT and GADIS-A into Vietnamese and examined their factor structures, measurement invariance, convergent validity, concurrent validity, and divergent validity among university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 610 young adults (mean age = 21.09 years; 63.4% females) were recruited using convenience sampling and who completed a paper-and-pencil survey between April and June 2023. All participants completed a demographic questionnaire, GDT, GADIS-A, and six standardized scales related to gaming disorder, social media addiction, smartphone addiction, and psychological distress. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency testing, and Pearson's correlations were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFA showed that the GDT had a one-factor structure and the GADIS-A had a two-factor structure. The internal consistency was excellent for both scales among this population. Moreover, both GDT and GADIS-A showed convergent, concurrent, and divergent validity with other standardized scales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Vietnamese versions of the GDT and GADIS-A have good psychometrics, which may be utilized in future research regarding gaming disorder among Vietnamese populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46901,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","volume":"37 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00328-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that the Gaming Disorder Test (GDT) and Gaming Disorder Scale for Adolescents (GADIS-A) have promising validity and reliability when assessing symptoms of gaming disorder among young adults. However, validity and reliability properties of the two scales have not been established among a Vietnamese population.

Objective: The present study translated the GDT and GADIS-A into Vietnamese and examined their factor structures, measurement invariance, convergent validity, concurrent validity, and divergent validity among university students.

Methods: A total of 610 young adults (mean age = 21.09 years; 63.4% females) were recruited using convenience sampling and who completed a paper-and-pencil survey between April and June 2023. All participants completed a demographic questionnaire, GDT, GADIS-A, and six standardized scales related to gaming disorder, social media addiction, smartphone addiction, and psychological distress. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency testing, and Pearson's correlations were performed.

Results: CFA showed that the GDT had a one-factor structure and the GADIS-A had a two-factor structure. The internal consistency was excellent for both scales among this population. Moreover, both GDT and GADIS-A showed convergent, concurrent, and divergent validity with other standardized scales.

Conclusion: The Vietnamese versions of the GDT and GADIS-A have good psychometrics, which may be utilized in future research regarding gaming disorder among Vietnamese populations.

青少年游戏障碍测试和游戏障碍量表:在越南青少年中的翻译和验证。
背景:以往的研究表明,游戏障碍测试(GDT)和青少年游戏障碍量表(GADIS-A)在评估青少年游戏障碍症状时具有良好的有效性和可靠性。然而,这两个量表的有效性和可靠性尚未在越南人群中得到证实:本研究将 GDT 和 GADIS-A 量表翻译成越南语,并考察了它们在大学生中的因子结构、测量不变性、收敛效度、并发效度和发散效度:采用便利抽样法共招募了 610 名年轻人(平均年龄 = 21.09 岁;63.4% 为女性),他们在 2023 年 4 月至 6 月期间完成了纸笔问卷调查。所有参与者都填写了一份人口统计学问卷、GDT、GADIS-A 和六个与游戏障碍、社交媒体成瘾、智能手机成瘾和心理困扰相关的标准化量表。研究人员进行了确认性因子分析(CFA)、内部一致性测试和皮尔逊相关性分析:CFA显示,GDT为单因素结构,GADIS-A为双因素结构。在该人群中,两个量表的内部一致性都非常好。此外,GDT和GADIS-A与其他标准化量表都具有收敛效度、并发效度和发散效度:结论:越南语版的GDT和GADIS-A具有良好的心理测量学特性,可用于未来有关越南人游戏障碍的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica
Psicologia-Reflexao E Critica PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Psicologia: Reflexão & Crítica is a journal published three times a year by Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia do Desenvolvimento (Psychology Graduate Program) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul). Its objective is to publish original works in the psychology field: articles, short reports on research and reviews as well as to present to the scientific community texts which reflect a significant contribution for the psychology field. The short title of the journal is Psicol. Refl. Crít. It must be used regarding bibliographies, footnotes, as well as bibliographical strips and references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信