Microfracture for medium size to large knee chondral defects has limited long-term efficacy: A systematic review

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Varun Gopinatth, Garrett R. Jackson, Daniel C. Touhey, Jorge Chahla, Matthew V. Smith, Matthew J. Matava, Robert H. Brophy, Derrick M. Knapik
{"title":"Microfracture for medium size to large knee chondral defects has limited long-term efficacy: A systematic review","authors":"Varun Gopinatth,&nbsp;Garrett R. Jackson,&nbsp;Daniel C. Touhey,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla,&nbsp;Matthew V. Smith,&nbsp;Matthew J. Matava,&nbsp;Robert H. Brophy,&nbsp;Derrick M. Knapik","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes, return to sport, failure rate, operations and complications in patients undergoing microfracture of the knee, including the femoral condyle, tibial plateau, patella and trochlea, at a mean 10-year or greater follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A literature search was performed by querying SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials from database inception through May 2023 according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Inclusion criteria were level I-IV human studies reporting on outcomes, reoperations and complications following microfracture of the knee at a mean 10-year or greater follow-up. Biomechanical and epidemiological studies, including patients undergoing concomitant realignment procedures, and studies with patients under 18 years old were excluded. Data regarding failure, as defined by each study, as well as reoperations were gathered. Study quality was assessed via the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nine studies from 2003 to 2018, consisting of 727 patients (mean age 38.9 ± 8.1 years; range 25.8–47.6) undergoing microfracture for chondral defects in the knee were identified. Mean follow-up ranged from 10 to 17 years. Males composed 56.5% of patients, with a mean defect size ranging from 2.3 to 4.01 cm<sup>2</sup>. Based on radiographs at follow-up, osteoarthritis progression occurred in 40%–48% of patients. Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scores were low. Patient-reported outcome measures showed significant improvement in postoperative scores at final follow-up. Return-to-sport rate ranged from 17.2% to 20%. Longitudinal analysis revealed declining clinical outcomes and return-to-sport rates from short- and mid- to long-term follow-up. There was high variability in failure definition and reoperations, with 2.9%–41% of patients requiring total knee arthroplasty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>At a mean 10-year or greater follow-up, microfracture for chondral defects of the knee 2–4 cm<sup>2</sup> in size demonstrated a high rate of osteoarthritis progression with poor healing of the chondral defect and low overall return-to-sport rates. Failure and reoperation rates ranged from 2.9% to 41%, with declining outcomes from short- and mid- to long-term follow-up. The advantages of microfracture relating to availability, complexity, and cost should be weighed against concerns about long-term success, particularly with medium-size and larger lesions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV systematic review.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes, return to sport, failure rate, operations and complications in patients undergoing microfracture of the knee, including the femoral condyle, tibial plateau, patella and trochlea, at a mean 10-year or greater follow-up.

Methods

A literature search was performed by querying SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials from database inception through May 2023 according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Inclusion criteria were level I-IV human studies reporting on outcomes, reoperations and complications following microfracture of the knee at a mean 10-year or greater follow-up. Biomechanical and epidemiological studies, including patients undergoing concomitant realignment procedures, and studies with patients under 18 years old were excluded. Data regarding failure, as defined by each study, as well as reoperations were gathered. Study quality was assessed via the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria.

Results

Nine studies from 2003 to 2018, consisting of 727 patients (mean age 38.9 ± 8.1 years; range 25.8–47.6) undergoing microfracture for chondral defects in the knee were identified. Mean follow-up ranged from 10 to 17 years. Males composed 56.5% of patients, with a mean defect size ranging from 2.3 to 4.01 cm2. Based on radiographs at follow-up, osteoarthritis progression occurred in 40%–48% of patients. Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue scores were low. Patient-reported outcome measures showed significant improvement in postoperative scores at final follow-up. Return-to-sport rate ranged from 17.2% to 20%. Longitudinal analysis revealed declining clinical outcomes and return-to-sport rates from short- and mid- to long-term follow-up. There was high variability in failure definition and reoperations, with 2.9%–41% of patients requiring total knee arthroplasty.

Conclusions

At a mean 10-year or greater follow-up, microfracture for chondral defects of the knee 2–4 cm2 in size demonstrated a high rate of osteoarthritis progression with poor healing of the chondral defect and low overall return-to-sport rates. Failure and reoperation rates ranged from 2.9% to 41%, with declining outcomes from short- and mid- to long-term follow-up. The advantages of microfracture relating to availability, complexity, and cost should be weighed against concerns about long-term success, particularly with medium-size and larger lesions.

Level of Evidence

Level IV systematic review.

Abstract Image

微骨折治疗中型至大型膝关节软骨缺损的长期疗效有限:系统综述。
目的:评估接受膝关节(包括股骨髁、胫骨平台、髌骨和套骨关节)微骨折术的患者在平均10年或更长时间的随访中的临床和影像学结果、运动恢复情况、失败率、手术和并发症:根据《2020 年系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》声明,通过查询 SCOPUS、PubMed、Medline 和 Cochrane Controlled Trials Central Register(对照试验中央登记册),对从数据库建立到 2023 年 5 月期间的文献进行了检索。纳入标准是对平均随访 10 年或更长时间的膝关节微骨折术后的疗效、再手术和并发症进行报告的 I-IV 级人类研究。不包括生物力学和流行病学研究,包括同时接受复位手术的患者,以及 18 岁以下患者的研究。收集了各项研究定义的失败数据以及再次手术数据。研究质量根据非随机研究方法指数标准进行评估:从2003年到2018年的9项研究共确定了727名患者(平均年龄为38.9±8.1岁;范围为25.8-47.6岁)接受了膝关节软骨缺损微骨折治疗。平均随访时间为 10 至 17 年。男性患者占 56.5%,平均缺损面积为 2.3 至 4.01 平方厘米。根据随访时的X光片显示,40%-48%的患者出现骨关节炎进展。软骨修复组织磁共振观察评分较低。患者报告结果显示,术后评分在最终随访时有明显改善。恢复运动率从17.2%到20%不等。纵向分析显示,从短期和中长期随访来看,临床结果和运动恢复率都在下降。失败定义和再次手术的差异很大,2.9%-41%的患者需要进行全膝关节置换术:结论:在平均10年或更长时间的随访中,膝关节软骨缺损微骨折术治疗2-4平方厘米大小的膝关节软骨缺损的骨关节炎进展率较高,软骨缺损愈合不良,总体运动恢复率较低。失败率和再手术率从 2.9% 到 41% 不等,短期和中长期随访结果均呈下降趋势。微骨折在可用性、复杂性和成本方面的优势应与对长期成功率的担忧进行权衡,尤其是对中等大小和较大的病变:IV级系统综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信