Is patella facet arthritis a contraindication to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current concepts.

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Todd E Bertrand, Patricia R Melvin, Adolph V Lombardi, Keith R Berend
{"title":"Is patella facet arthritis a contraindication to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current concepts.","authors":"Todd E Bertrand, Patricia R Melvin, Adolph V Lombardi, Keith R Berend","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased in popularity for the ​treatment of end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis in part secondary to its quicker recovery, improved function, and decreased risk of medical complications over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, despite the success of medial UKA, dilemma still exists over certain patient characteristics as to suitability for undergoing the procedure. In addition to patient age, body mass index (BMI), and the presence, or lack thereof, of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), one of the most contentious issues surrounding suitability for medial UKA is the preoperative status of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). This review aims to look at the historical factors leading to the current dilemma as well as recent evidence surrounding anterior knee pain and preoperative PFJ arthritis on the survivability and outcomes of medial UKA. This article will also evaluate other PFJ factors possibly affecting the outcome of medial UKA such as lateral patellar subluxation and lateral facet grooving, future perspectives that may influence the utilization of medial UKA such as cementless implants, and the choice of mobile versus fixed bearing articulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has increased in popularity for the ​treatment of end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis in part secondary to its quicker recovery, improved function, and decreased risk of medical complications over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, despite the success of medial UKA, dilemma still exists over certain patient characteristics as to suitability for undergoing the procedure. In addition to patient age, body mass index (BMI), and the presence, or lack thereof, of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), one of the most contentious issues surrounding suitability for medial UKA is the preoperative status of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). This review aims to look at the historical factors leading to the current dilemma as well as recent evidence surrounding anterior knee pain and preoperative PFJ arthritis on the survivability and outcomes of medial UKA. This article will also evaluate other PFJ factors possibly affecting the outcome of medial UKA such as lateral patellar subluxation and lateral facet grooving, future perspectives that may influence the utilization of medial UKA such as cementless implants, and the choice of mobile versus fixed bearing articulations.

髌骨面关节炎是单隔间膝关节置换术的禁忌症吗?当前的概念。
与全膝关节置换术(TKA)相比,内侧膝关节单间室关节置换术(UKA)恢复更快、功能更好、并发症风险更低,因此在治疗终末期前内侧骨关节炎方面越来越受欢迎。然而,尽管内侧 UKA 取得了成功,但对于患者的某些特征是否适合接受该手术仍存在争议。除了患者的年龄、体重指数(BMI)、前交叉韧带(ACL)的存在与否外,围绕内侧UKA手术适宜性最有争议的问题之一是髌股关节(PFJ)的术前状态。本综述旨在探讨导致当前困境的历史因素,以及围绕膝前疼痛和术前 PFJ 关节炎对内侧 UKA 的存活率和疗效的最新证据。本文还将评估可能影响内侧UKA结果的其他PFJ因素,如外侧髌骨半脱位和外侧切面开槽,可能影响内侧UKA使用的未来前景,如无骨水泥植入物,以及移动与固定支承关节的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信