[Desire to have children after vasectomy : Vasectomy reversal or assisted reproductive technology?]

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologie Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1007/s00120-024-02454-9
Armin Soave, Sabine Kliesch, Jann-Frederik Cremers
{"title":"[Desire to have children after vasectomy : Vasectomy reversal or assisted reproductive technology?]","authors":"Armin Soave, Sabine Kliesch, Jann-Frederik Cremers","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02454-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The vasectomy is a safe and effective method of contraception for men. Up to 6% of men who underwent vasectomy have a renewed child wish. Microsurgical vasectomy reversal (VR) in men, microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA), or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in men plus assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the female partner as well as the combination of VR and MESA/TESE plus ART represent established therapeutic strategies. Various factors may impact the success of VR, as defined by patency and pregnancy rate following VR, including the female partner's age, the obstructive interval, and the surgical VR technique. There is no difference in the pregnancy and live birth rate following VR or MESA/TESE plus ART. However, following MESA/TESE plus ART, time to pregnancy is shorter compared with VR. Overall, VR is more cost-effective than MESA/TESE plus ART and allows for a lower therapeutic burden, especially in the female partner. In addition, VR combined with TESE plus-if necessary-ART is more cost-effective than MESA/TESE plus ART alone, even in female partners with advanced age. For successful counseling regarding the different therapy options for a renewed child wish after vasectomy, it is important to evaluate the underlying individual situation of the couple.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"1111-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-024-02454-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The vasectomy is a safe and effective method of contraception for men. Up to 6% of men who underwent vasectomy have a renewed child wish. Microsurgical vasectomy reversal (VR) in men, microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA), or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in men plus assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the female partner as well as the combination of VR and MESA/TESE plus ART represent established therapeutic strategies. Various factors may impact the success of VR, as defined by patency and pregnancy rate following VR, including the female partner's age, the obstructive interval, and the surgical VR technique. There is no difference in the pregnancy and live birth rate following VR or MESA/TESE plus ART. However, following MESA/TESE plus ART, time to pregnancy is shorter compared with VR. Overall, VR is more cost-effective than MESA/TESE plus ART and allows for a lower therapeutic burden, especially in the female partner. In addition, VR combined with TESE plus-if necessary-ART is more cost-effective than MESA/TESE plus ART alone, even in female partners with advanced age. For successful counseling regarding the different therapy options for a renewed child wish after vasectomy, it is important to evaluate the underlying individual situation of the couple.

[输精管结扎术后想要孩子 :输精管复通术还是辅助生殖技术?]
输精管结扎术是一种安全有效的男性避孕方法。在接受输精管结扎手术的男性中,多达 6% 的人有再次生育的愿望。男性显微外科输精管结扎逆转术(VR)、显微外科附睾精子抽吸术(MESA)或男性睾丸取精术(TESE)加上女性伴侣的辅助生殖技术(ART),以及 VR 和 MESA/TESE 加上 ART 的组合,都是成熟的治疗策略。根据 VR 后的通畅率和妊娠率,有多种因素可能会影响 VR 的成功率,包括女性伴侣的年龄、阻塞间隔和手术 VR 技术。VR 或 MESA/TESE 加 ART 后的妊娠率和活产率没有差异。不过,与 VR 相比,MESA/TESE 加 ART 术后的妊娠时间更短。总体而言,VR 比 MESA/TESE 加 ART 更具成本效益,治疗负担更轻,尤其是对女性伴侣而言。此外,VR 与 TESE 加 ART(如有必要)相结合,比 MESA/TESE 加 ART 单独治疗更具成本效益,即使对高龄女性伴侣也是如此。要成功地就输精管结扎术后再次生育的不同治疗方案提供咨询,必须对夫妇双方的基本个人情况进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologie
Urologie UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信