[Short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system combined with cannulated compression screw fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].

Q3 Medicine
Zhaodong Wang, Yajun Liu, Chen Xu, Keyou Duan, Zhonglian Zhu, Min Wu, Jianzhong Guan
{"title":"[Short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system combined with cannulated compression screw fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].","authors":"Zhaodong Wang, Yajun Liu, Chen Xu, Keyou Duan, Zhonglian Zhu, Min Wu, Jianzhong Guan","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202406075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system (FNS) combined with cannulated compression screw (CCS) fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical data of 49 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures, who met the selection criteria and admitted between January 2021 and June 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. After reduction of femoral neck fractures, 27 cases were treated with robot-guided FNS fixation (FNS group) and 22 cases with robot-guided FNS and CCS fixation (FNS+CCS group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, cause of fracture, time from fracture to operation, fracture side, and classification (Garden classification and Pauwels classification) between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, the time when the patient began bearing weight, and hip joint pain and functional scores (VAS score and Harris score) at last follow-up for two groups were recorded. Imaging re-examination was taken to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction, fracture healing, as well as the occurrence of fracture non-union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and femoral neck shortening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All operations were successfully completed and the incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05), and the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in FNS+CCS group significantly increased compared to FNS group ( <i>P</i><0.05). All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.1 months). Imaging re-examination showed that there was no significant difference in fracture reduction quality between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05), but the fracture healing time was significantly shorter in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group, and weight-bearing began earlier ( <i>P</i><0.05). The incidences of femoral neck shortening, fracture non-union, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head were lower in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group, and there was significant difference in the incidence of femoral neck shortening between groups ( <i>P</i><0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). However, the Harris score was significantly higher in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group ( <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with FNS fixation alone, robot-guided FNS combined with CCS fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients has obvious advantages in terms of early weight bearing and fracture healing, improves fracture healing rate, effectively prevents postoperative complications, and can obtain good short-term effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"38 10","pages":"1229-1235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11522545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202406075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system (FNS) combined with cannulated compression screw (CCS) fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients.

Methods: A clinical data of 49 young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures, who met the selection criteria and admitted between January 2021 and June 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. After reduction of femoral neck fractures, 27 cases were treated with robot-guided FNS fixation (FNS group) and 22 cases with robot-guided FNS and CCS fixation (FNS+CCS group). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, cause of fracture, time from fracture to operation, fracture side, and classification (Garden classification and Pauwels classification) between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, the time when the patient began bearing weight, and hip joint pain and functional scores (VAS score and Harris score) at last follow-up for two groups were recorded. Imaging re-examination was taken to evaluate the quality of fracture reduction, fracture healing, as well as the occurrence of fracture non-union, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and femoral neck shortening.

Results: All operations were successfully completed and the incisions healed by first intention. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05), and the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in FNS+CCS group significantly increased compared to FNS group ( P<0.05). All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.1 months). Imaging re-examination showed that there was no significant difference in fracture reduction quality between the two groups ( P>0.05), but the fracture healing time was significantly shorter in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group, and weight-bearing began earlier ( P<0.05). The incidences of femoral neck shortening, fracture non-union, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head were lower in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group, and there was significant difference in the incidence of femoral neck shortening between groups ( P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups ( P>0.05). However, the Harris score was significantly higher in FNS+CCS group than in FNS group ( P<0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with FNS fixation alone, robot-guided FNS combined with CCS fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients has obvious advantages in terms of early weight bearing and fracture healing, improves fracture healing rate, effectively prevents postoperative complications, and can obtain good short-term effectiveness.

[机器人引导下股骨颈系统联合套管加压螺钉固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的短期疗效]。
目的探讨机器人引导下股骨颈系统(FNS)联合套管加压螺钉(CCS)固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折的短期疗效:回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年6月期间收治的49例符合入选标准的中青年股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料。股骨颈骨折复位后,27例采用机器人引导的FNS固定(FNS组),22例采用机器人引导的FNS和CCS固定(FNS+CCS组)。两组患者的性别、年龄、骨折原因、骨折至手术时间、骨折侧、分型(Garden分型和Pauwels分型)等基线数据无明显差异(P>0.05)。记录两组患者的手术时间、术中失血量、术中透视次数、患者开始负重的时间以及最后一次随访时的髋关节疼痛和功能评分(VAS评分和Harris评分)。通过影像学复查评估骨折复位质量、骨折愈合情况以及骨折不愈合、股骨头坏死和股骨颈缩短的发生情况:所有手术均顺利完成,切口第一意图愈合。两组手术时间及术中失血量无明显差异(P>0.05),FNS+CCS组术中透视次数较FNS组明显增加(PP>0.05),但FNS+CCS组骨折愈合时间明显短于FNS组,且开始负重时间明显早于FNS组(PPP>0.05)。然而,FNS+CCS 组的 Harris 评分明显高于 FNS 组(结论:与单纯 FNS 固定相比,FNS+CCS 组的骨折愈合时间明显短于 FNS 组:与单纯FNS固定相比,机器人引导下FNS联合CCS固定治疗中青年股骨颈骨折在早期负重和骨折愈合方面具有明显优势,能提高骨折愈合率,有效预防术后并发症,可获得良好的短期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信