Obliteration of the Superior Petrosal Vein During Cerebellopontine Angle-Surgery: More Cons than Pros?

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
H Joswig, U Träger, G Hildebrandt
{"title":"Obliteration of the Superior Petrosal Vein During Cerebellopontine Angle-Surgery: More Cons than Pros?","authors":"H Joswig, U Träger, G Hildebrandt","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A profound knowledge of the anatomy and surgical management of the superior petrosal vein (SPV) is vital during neurosurgical procedures in the posterior fossa. The debate on preserving the SPV or whether it can be duly obliterated is still ongoing. This review provides an update on all historical articles pertaining to the risk profile of superior petrosal sacrifice since Walter Dandy. Not only were the heterogenous methods but also the respective authors' conclusions analyzed. In light of the collected evidence, we come to the conclusion that occluding the SPV poses an ineligible risk to patient safety and should be considered obsolete.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A profound knowledge of the anatomy and surgical management of the superior petrosal vein (SPV) is vital during neurosurgical procedures in the posterior fossa. The debate on preserving the SPV or whether it can be duly obliterated is still ongoing. This review provides an update on all historical articles pertaining to the risk profile of superior petrosal sacrifice since Walter Dandy. Not only were the heterogenous methods but also the respective authors' conclusions analyzed. In light of the collected evidence, we come to the conclusion that occluding the SPV poses an ineligible risk to patient safety and should be considered obsolete.

在小脑脑角手术中阻断上瓣静脉:弊大于利?
在后窝的神经外科手术中,对上皮下静脉的解剖和手术管理有深刻的了解至关重要。关于保留鞍上静脉或是否可以适当阻断鞍上静脉的争论仍在继续。这篇综述更新了自 Walter Dandy 以来所有与牺牲鞍上静脉风险相关的历史文章。不仅分析了不同的方法,还分析了各自作者的结论。根据收集到的证据,我们得出结论,闭塞上瓣静脉对患者安全构成了不合格的风险,应被视为过时的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信