[Rapid review: effectiveness of the Wolbachia strategy for arbovirus controlRevisión sistemática rápida: efectividad de la estrategia de control con Wolbachia en la lucha contra las arbovirosis].

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alanis Amorim Angotti, João Gabriel Sanchez Tavares da Silva, Tatiana Yonekura, Mabel Fernandes Figueiró
{"title":"[Rapid review: effectiveness of the <i>Wolbachia</i> strategy for arbovirus controlRevisión sistemática rápida: efectividad de la estrategia de control con <i>Wolbachia</i> en la lucha contra las arbovirosis].","authors":"Alanis Amorim Angotti, João Gabriel Sanchez Tavares da Silva, Tatiana Yonekura, Mabel Fernandes Figueiró","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2024.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and synthesize evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the <i>Wolbachia-Aedes</i> methodology for reducing cases of arboviral infection.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Rapid systematic review. A search of five online portals and bibliographic databases was conducted in February 2022. Two reviewers conducted the selection stages, with any disagreements resolved by a third investigator. Data were extracted by one reviewer and subsequently checked by another. The inclusion criteria were studies describing the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of the <i>Wolbachia-Aedes</i> methodology, based on field interventions, published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, with no restrictions on date of publication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies were included: one cluster randomized trial, two quasi-experimental studies, and one pre-post study, published between 2019 and 2021 in four countries. The included studies reported effectiveness for some of the outcomes of interest, such as a reduction in the incidence of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya cases. Although no experimental studies addressing the cost-effectiveness of the <i>Wolbachia-Aedes</i> strategy were identified, some modeling studies have demonstrated potential cost-benefit of this methodology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the results of the included studies, <i>Wolbachia</i> has the potential to be an economically effective strategy that leads to reductions in the incidence of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya. Nevertheless, this strategy cannot yet be recommended as a public policy; additional large-scale studies with high methodological quality are still needed to inform political decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 ","pages":"e98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.98","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify and synthesize evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Wolbachia-Aedes methodology for reducing cases of arboviral infection.

Methodology: Rapid systematic review. A search of five online portals and bibliographic databases was conducted in February 2022. Two reviewers conducted the selection stages, with any disagreements resolved by a third investigator. Data were extracted by one reviewer and subsequently checked by another. The inclusion criteria were studies describing the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of the Wolbachia-Aedes methodology, based on field interventions, published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, with no restrictions on date of publication.

Results: Four studies were included: one cluster randomized trial, two quasi-experimental studies, and one pre-post study, published between 2019 and 2021 in four countries. The included studies reported effectiveness for some of the outcomes of interest, such as a reduction in the incidence of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya cases. Although no experimental studies addressing the cost-effectiveness of the Wolbachia-Aedes strategy were identified, some modeling studies have demonstrated potential cost-benefit of this methodology.

Conclusion: Considering the results of the included studies, Wolbachia has the potential to be an economically effective strategy that leads to reductions in the incidence of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya. Nevertheless, this strategy cannot yet be recommended as a public policy; additional large-scale studies with high methodological quality are still needed to inform political decision-making.

[快速评论:沃尔巴克氏菌控制虫媒病毒策略的有效性快速评论:沃尔巴克氏菌控制虫媒病毒策略的有效性]。
目的确定并综合有关沃尔巴克氏体-伊蚊方法在减少虫媒病毒感染病例方面的有效性和成本效益的证据:快速系统综述。2022 年 2 月,对五个在线门户网站和文献数据库进行了搜索。由两名审稿人进行筛选,如有分歧,由第三名调查人员解决。数据由一名审稿人提取,随后由另一名审稿人核对。纳入标准是以葡萄牙语、英语和西班牙语发表的、描述基于现场干预的沃尔巴克氏菌-伊蚊方法的成本效益和有效性的研究,对发表日期没有限制:结果:共纳入四项研究:一项群组随机试验、两项准实验研究和一项前后期研究,发表于 2019 年至 2021 年期间的四个国家。纳入的研究报告了一些相关结果的有效性,如登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅病例发病率的降低。虽然没有发现针对沃尔巴克氏菌-伊蚊策略成本效益的实验研究,但一些建模研究已经证明了这种方法的潜在成本效益:考虑到所纳入研究的结果,沃尔巴克氏菌有可能成为一种经济有效的策略,从而降低登革热、寨卡病和基孔肯雅病的发病率。尽管如此,目前还不能建议将这一策略作为一项公共政策;还需要进行更多方法学质量高的大规模研究,为政治决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信