The Bacterial Species Behind the Wound and Their Antibacterial Resistant Pattern: A Three-Year Retrospective Study at St. Dominic Hospital, Akwatia, Ghana

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
John Gameli Deku, Enoch Aninagyei, Israel Bedzina, Francisca Esenam Goloe, Vida Angmorkie Eshun, Eunice Agyei, Jonathan Maniye Nmoandor, Richard Vikpebah Duneeh, Kwabena Obeng Duedu
{"title":"The Bacterial Species Behind the Wound and Their Antibacterial Resistant Pattern: A Three-Year Retrospective Study at St. Dominic Hospital, Akwatia, Ghana","authors":"John Gameli Deku,&nbsp;Enoch Aninagyei,&nbsp;Israel Bedzina,&nbsp;Francisca Esenam Goloe,&nbsp;Vida Angmorkie Eshun,&nbsp;Eunice Agyei,&nbsp;Jonathan Maniye Nmoandor,&nbsp;Richard Vikpebah Duneeh,&nbsp;Kwabena Obeng Duedu","doi":"10.1002/jcla.25114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Wound infections are often underestimated issues that can lead to chronic illnesses, and since the introduction of antibiotics, wound complications have become less common. However, due to the increased and irrational use of these antibiotics, the resistance in the bacterial isolates has become very common. This has led to reduced treatment options, delay in wound healing, and high treatment costs. This study aimed to investigate bacterial wound infections and their antibiotic resistance at St. Dominic Hospital, Ghana.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 517 records of wound swab culture and susceptibility testing, and patient demographics from 2020 to 2022 were collected from the microbiology unit of St. Dominic Hospital in the Eastern Region of Ghana. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel 2019, cleaned, and exported into IBM SPSS v26 for the statistical analysis. <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The overall prevalence of bacteriological agents causing wound infection in individuals who visited the St. Dominic Hospital from 2020 to 2022 was 70.21% (363/517), with <i>S. aureus</i> 79/363 (21.76%) being the most abundant isolate. Out of the 79 <i>S</i>. <i>aureus</i> isolated, 40 (50.63%) and 39 (49.37%) were resistant to ampicillin and cephalexin, respectively. More than 50% of the predominant Gram-negative isolate, <i>K.</i> <i>pneumoniae</i>, were resistant to clindamycin 45/72 (62.50%) but susceptible to levofloxacin 70/72 (97.22%), cefotetan 69/72 (95.83%), and chloramphenicol 67/72 (93.06%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Antibacterial susceptibility patterns revealed significant resistance trends, particularly among Gram-negative isolates, emphasizing the urgent need for prudent antibiotic use and ongoing surveillance to combat resistance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":"38 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.25114","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.25114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Wound infections are often underestimated issues that can lead to chronic illnesses, and since the introduction of antibiotics, wound complications have become less common. However, due to the increased and irrational use of these antibiotics, the resistance in the bacterial isolates has become very common. This has led to reduced treatment options, delay in wound healing, and high treatment costs. This study aimed to investigate bacterial wound infections and their antibiotic resistance at St. Dominic Hospital, Ghana.

Methods

A total of 517 records of wound swab culture and susceptibility testing, and patient demographics from 2020 to 2022 were collected from the microbiology unit of St. Dominic Hospital in the Eastern Region of Ghana. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel 2019, cleaned, and exported into IBM SPSS v26 for the statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

Results

The overall prevalence of bacteriological agents causing wound infection in individuals who visited the St. Dominic Hospital from 2020 to 2022 was 70.21% (363/517), with S. aureus 79/363 (21.76%) being the most abundant isolate. Out of the 79 S. aureus isolated, 40 (50.63%) and 39 (49.37%) were resistant to ampicillin and cephalexin, respectively. More than 50% of the predominant Gram-negative isolate, K. pneumoniae, were resistant to clindamycin 45/72 (62.50%) but susceptible to levofloxacin 70/72 (97.22%), cefotetan 69/72 (95.83%), and chloramphenicol 67/72 (93.06%).

Conclusion

Antibacterial susceptibility patterns revealed significant resistance trends, particularly among Gram-negative isolates, emphasizing the urgent need for prudent antibiotic use and ongoing surveillance to combat resistance.

Abstract Image

伤口背后的细菌种类及其抗菌模式:加纳 Akwatia 圣多米尼克医院的三年回顾性研究。
背景:伤口感染往往是一个被低估的问题,它可能导致慢性疾病,自从抗生素问世以来,伤口并发症已变得不那么常见。然而,由于这些抗生素使用的增加和不合理,细菌分离物的抗药性变得非常普遍。这导致治疗方案减少,伤口愈合延迟,治疗费用高昂。本研究旨在调查加纳圣多米尼克医院的细菌伤口感染及其抗生素耐药性:从加纳东部地区的圣多米尼克医院微生物室收集了 2020 年至 2022 年期间的 517 份伤口拭子培养和药敏试验记录以及患者人口统计数据。数据输入 Microsoft Excel 2019,经过清理后导出到 IBM SPSS v26 进行统计分析:2020 年至 2022 年期间,在圣多米尼克医院就诊的患者中,导致伤口感染的细菌病原体的总体流行率为 70.21%(363/517),其中金黄色葡萄球菌 79/363(21.76%)是最多的分离菌株。在分离出的 79 个金黄色葡萄球菌中,分别有 40 个(50.63%)和 39 个(49.37%)对氨苄西林和头孢菌素产生耐药性。超过 50%的主要革兰氏阴性分离菌肺炎双球菌对克林霉素 45/72 (62.50%)具有耐药性,但对左氧氟沙星 70/72 (97.22%)、头孢替坦 69/72 (95.83%)和氯霉素 67/72 (93.06%)具有敏感性:抗菌药敏感性模式显示出明显的耐药性趋势,尤其是在革兰氏阴性分离株中,这强调了谨慎使用抗生素和持续监测以消除耐药性的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信