Adaptation of Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves for Pulmonary Position: Comparative Analysis of Transcatheter and Surgical Valves.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mina Shafiei, Dong Qiu, Ali N Azadani
{"title":"Adaptation of Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves for Pulmonary Position: Comparative Analysis of Transcatheter and Surgical Valves.","authors":"Mina Shafiei, Dong Qiu, Ali N Azadani","doi":"10.1007/s12265-024-10528-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary valve dysfunction is common in congenital heart disease, often leading to interventions like right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has emerged as a successful alternative to surgery, showcasing promising outcomes for managing postoperative RVOT complications. The study aimed to compare two bioprosthetic valves-Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease surgical valve and Edwards SAPIEN 3 transcatheter valve-originally designed for aortic use but adapted for pulmonary applications. The hemodynamic characteristics of a 26-mm SAPIEN 3 and a 25-mm Magna Ease were assessed in a pulse duplicator under both pulmonary and aortic conditions. Furthermore, detailed structural analyses of the leaflets were conducted using computational simulations under these conditions. The results highlighted significant differences in the hydrodynamic and structural characteristics of these two bioprosthetic valves when exposed to pulmonary versus aortic conditions. The study enhances our understanding of the biomechanics involved in surgical and transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":15224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"1338-1346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-024-10528-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulmonary valve dysfunction is common in congenital heart disease, often leading to interventions like right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has emerged as a successful alternative to surgery, showcasing promising outcomes for managing postoperative RVOT complications. The study aimed to compare two bioprosthetic valves-Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease surgical valve and Edwards SAPIEN 3 transcatheter valve-originally designed for aortic use but adapted for pulmonary applications. The hemodynamic characteristics of a 26-mm SAPIEN 3 and a 25-mm Magna Ease were assessed in a pulse duplicator under both pulmonary and aortic conditions. Furthermore, detailed structural analyses of the leaflets were conducted using computational simulations under these conditions. The results highlighted significant differences in the hydrodynamic and structural characteristics of these two bioprosthetic valves when exposed to pulmonary versus aortic conditions. The study enhances our understanding of the biomechanics involved in surgical and transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement.

适应肺部位置的主动脉生物人工瓣膜:经导管瓣膜与手术瓣膜的比较分析。
肺动脉瓣功能障碍在先天性心脏病中很常见,常常导致右心室流出道重建等干预措施。经导管肺动脉瓣置换术(TPVR)已成为手术的成功替代方案,在控制术后右心室流出道并发症方面取得了可喜的成果。该研究旨在比较两种生物人工瓣膜--Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease手术瓣膜和Edwards SAPIEN 3经导管瓣膜--这两种瓣膜最初是为主动脉瓣设计的,但经调整后可用于肺动脉瓣。我们在脉冲复制器中评估了 26 毫米 SAPIEN 3 和 25 毫米 Magna Ease 在肺动脉和主动脉条件下的血液动力学特性。此外,还在这些条件下通过计算模拟对叶片进行了详细的结构分析。结果表明,这两种生物人工瓣膜在肺动脉和主动脉条件下的流体动力学和结构特性存在明显差异。这项研究加深了我们对手术和经导管肺动脉瓣置换所涉及的生物力学的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research (JCTR) is a premier journal in cardiovascular translational research. JCTR is the journal of choice for authors seeking the broadest audience for emerging technologies, therapies and diagnostics, pre-clinical research, and first-in-man clinical trials. JCTR''s intent is to provide a forum for critical evaluation of the novel cardiovascular science, to showcase important and clinically relevant aspects of the new research, as well as to discuss the impediments that may need to be overcome during the translation to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信