In-hospital systolic blood pressure lowering patterns and risk of rehospitalization for angina in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Chi Wang, Yanjie Li, Lu Tian, Zekun Feng, Cuijuan Yun, Sijin Zhang, Yizhen Sun, Ziwei Hou, Siyu Yao, Miao Wang, Maoxiang Zhao, Lihua Lan, Jianxiang Huang, Zhen Ge, Hao Xue
{"title":"In-hospital systolic blood pressure lowering patterns and risk of rehospitalization for angina in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease.","authors":"Chi Wang, Yanjie Li, Lu Tian, Zekun Feng, Cuijuan Yun, Sijin Zhang, Yizhen Sun, Ziwei Hou, Siyu Yao, Miao Wang, Maoxiang Zhao, Lihua Lan, Jianxiang Huang, Zhen Ge, Hao Xue","doi":"10.1038/s41440-024-01942-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine the association between in-hospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering patterns and rehospitalization for angina in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease (HT-CAD). This prospective cohort study was conducted in Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. We included 730 patients with HT-CAD, who were hospitalized between August 2020 and September 2022. The in-hospital SBP lowering patterns were identified according to SBP level at admission, SBP level at discharge, and the difference between them: normal-stable SBP, more-intensive SBP reduction, less-intensive SBP reduction, and non-reduced SBP. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the risk of rehospitalization for angina according to SBP lowering patterns. We identified 121 cases of rehospitalization for angina in a median follow-up of 28.2 months. Patients with more-intensive SBP reduction had the lowest incidence rate of rehospitalization for angina, followed by those with normal-stable SBP, less-intensive SBP reduction, and non-reduced SBP. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that compared with patients with more-intensive SBP reduction, the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of rehospitalization for angina were 1.35 (0.78-2.35) for patients with normal-stable SBP, 2.17 (1.14-4.14) for patients with less-intensive SBP reduction, and 2.99 (1.57-5.68) for patients with non-reduced SBP. This association was more pronounced in patients with multi-vessel stenosis than in patients with single-vessel stenosis. In conclusion, in-hospital SBP lowering patterns were associated with risk of rehospitalization for angina. These results highlighted the importance of intensive in-hospital SBP control in patients with HT-CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13029,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-024-01942-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the association between in-hospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering patterns and rehospitalization for angina in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease (HT-CAD). This prospective cohort study was conducted in Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. We included 730 patients with HT-CAD, who were hospitalized between August 2020 and September 2022. The in-hospital SBP lowering patterns were identified according to SBP level at admission, SBP level at discharge, and the difference between them: normal-stable SBP, more-intensive SBP reduction, less-intensive SBP reduction, and non-reduced SBP. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the risk of rehospitalization for angina according to SBP lowering patterns. We identified 121 cases of rehospitalization for angina in a median follow-up of 28.2 months. Patients with more-intensive SBP reduction had the lowest incidence rate of rehospitalization for angina, followed by those with normal-stable SBP, less-intensive SBP reduction, and non-reduced SBP. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found that compared with patients with more-intensive SBP reduction, the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of rehospitalization for angina were 1.35 (0.78-2.35) for patients with normal-stable SBP, 2.17 (1.14-4.14) for patients with less-intensive SBP reduction, and 2.99 (1.57-5.68) for patients with non-reduced SBP. This association was more pronounced in patients with multi-vessel stenosis than in patients with single-vessel stenosis. In conclusion, in-hospital SBP lowering patterns were associated with risk of rehospitalization for angina. These results highlighted the importance of intensive in-hospital SBP control in patients with HT-CAD.

高血压和冠心病患者院内收缩压降低模式与心绞痛再住院风险。
本研究旨在探讨高血压合并冠心病(HT-CAD)患者院内收缩压(SBP)降低模式与心绞痛再住院之间的关系。这项前瞻性队列研究在中国北京中国人民解放军总医院进行。我们纳入了 730 名高血压合并冠心病(HT-CAD)患者,他们均在 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 9 月期间住院治疗。根据入院时的 SBP 水平、出院时的 SBP 水平以及两者之间的差异,确定了院内 SBP 降低模式:正常稳定 SBP、SBP 降低强度较高、SBP 降低强度较低、SBP 未降低。我们采用 Cox 比例危险度回归法,根据降低 SBP 的模式来估算心绞痛再住院的风险。在中位 28.2 个月的随访中,我们发现了 121 例因心绞痛再次住院的病例。SBP降低强度较大的患者因心绞痛再次住院的发生率最低,其次是SBP正常稳定、SBP降低强度较小和SBP未降低的患者。在对潜在的混杂因素进行调整后,我们发现与SBP降低强度较大的患者相比,SBP正常稳定患者心绞痛再住院的危险比和95%置信区间分别为1.35(0.78-2.35),SBP降低强度较小的患者为2.17(1.14-4.14),SBP未降低的患者为2.99(1.57-5.68)。这种关联在多血管狭窄患者中比单血管狭窄患者更明显。总之,院内 SBP 降低模式与心绞痛再住院风险相关。这些结果凸显了对高血压-冠心病患者加强院内SBP控制的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hypertension Research
Hypertension Research 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hypertension Research is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. The journal publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. The journal publishes Review Articles, Articles, Correspondence and Comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信