Centering Social Justice and Equity in Research on Accessibility to Public Buildings for Individuals with Mobility Disabilities: A scoping review.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.153797.2
Sidhiprada Mohapatra, G Arun Maiya, Ullas U Nayak, Leno Benny, Joanne Watson, Amit Kinjawadekar, Rama Devi Nandineni
{"title":"Centering Social Justice and Equity in Research on Accessibility to Public Buildings for Individuals with Mobility Disabilities: A scoping review.","authors":"Sidhiprada Mohapatra, G Arun Maiya, Ullas U Nayak, Leno Benny, Joanne Watson, Amit Kinjawadekar, Rama Devi Nandineni","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.153797.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore how principles of social justice and equity are integrated into research concerning accessibility to public buildings for individuals with mobility disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilising a scoping review methodology to assess literature based on the criteria set by the Joanna Briggs Institute, seven databases were screened. Studies were selected using the framework: \"persons with mobility disabilities\" AND \"accessibility\" AND \"public buildings\". A theoretical framework helped to extract codes and develop themes through an inductive-deductive analysis method. The results are presented descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The examination of 84 studies uncovered a complex interplay between agencies, systemic challenges, discriminatory practices, and societal attitudes perpetuating marginalisation of individuals with mobility disabilities in their access to public buildings. The recommendations emphasize importance of practical measures, research imperatives, and policy developments to promote inclusivity. We present a 'Ten-step approach' to integrate social justice and equity into research on accessibility in public buildings for people with mobility disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating diversity, active participation, and inclusive methodologies are essential to address systemic issues, discriminatory practices, and societal attitudes that hinder accessibility and inclusion. Collaborations with diverse stakeholders are crucial for policy changes, resource allocation, and advancing social justice and equity in accessibility research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.153797.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore how principles of social justice and equity are integrated into research concerning accessibility to public buildings for individuals with mobility disabilities.

Methods: Utilising a scoping review methodology to assess literature based on the criteria set by the Joanna Briggs Institute, seven databases were screened. Studies were selected using the framework: "persons with mobility disabilities" AND "accessibility" AND "public buildings". A theoretical framework helped to extract codes and develop themes through an inductive-deductive analysis method. The results are presented descriptively.

Results: The examination of 84 studies uncovered a complex interplay between agencies, systemic challenges, discriminatory practices, and societal attitudes perpetuating marginalisation of individuals with mobility disabilities in their access to public buildings. The recommendations emphasize importance of practical measures, research imperatives, and policy developments to promote inclusivity. We present a 'Ten-step approach' to integrate social justice and equity into research on accessibility in public buildings for people with mobility disabilities.

Conclusion: Integrating diversity, active participation, and inclusive methodologies are essential to address systemic issues, discriminatory practices, and societal attitudes that hinder accessibility and inclusion. Collaborations with diverse stakeholders are crucial for policy changes, resource allocation, and advancing social justice and equity in accessibility research and practice.

行动不便者无障碍进入公共建筑研究中的社会公正与公平:范围审查。
目的:探讨如何将社会正义与公平原则纳入有关行动不便者公共建筑无障碍环境的研究中:根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)制定的标准,采用范围审查法对文献进行评估,筛选了七个数据库。筛选研究时使用了以下框架"行动不便者"、"无障碍环境 "和 "公共建筑"。理论框架有助于通过归纳-演绎分析方法提取代码和发展主题。研究结果以描述性方式呈现:对 84 项研究的审查揭示了机构、系统性挑战、歧视性做法和社会态度之间复杂的相互作用,这些因素导致行动不便者在进入公共建筑时长期被边缘化。这些建议强调了促进包容性的实际措施、研究要务和政策发展的重要性。我们提出了一个 "十步方法",将社会正义和公平融入到行动不便者公共建筑无障碍研究中:整合多样性、积极参与和包容性方法对于解决阻碍无障碍和包容性的系统性问题、歧视性做法和社会态度至关重要。与不同利益相关者的合作对于政策变革、资源分配以及在无障碍研究和实践中促进社会公正和公平至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信