Understanding the risk of ionizing radiation in breast imaging: Concepts and quantities, clinical importance, and future directions

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
S. Di Maria , T.J.A. van Nijnatten , C.R.L.P.N. Jeukens , S. Vedantham , M. Dietzel , P. Vaz
{"title":"Understanding the risk of ionizing radiation in breast imaging: Concepts and quantities, clinical importance, and future directions","authors":"S. Di Maria ,&nbsp;T.J.A. van Nijnatten ,&nbsp;C.R.L.P.N. Jeukens ,&nbsp;S. Vedantham ,&nbsp;M. Dietzel ,&nbsp;P. Vaz","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Conventional mammography remains the primary imaging modality for state-of-the-art breast imaging practice and its benefit (both on diagnostic and screening) was largely reported. In mammography, the typical Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) from X-ray radiation to the breast spans, on average, from 1 to 10 mGy, depending on breast thicknesses, percentage of fibroglandular tissue, and on the examination purpose.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The aim of this narrative review is to describe the extent of radiation risk in X-ray breast imaging and discuss the main steps and parameters (e.g. MGD, screening frequency and number of examination views) that may have an influence on the radiation risk assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Even though the radiation doses used with these examinations are very low, as compared to other medical or natural radiation exposures, there is a non-negligible associated risk of radiation-induced cancer. Accurate radiation risk assessment permits to better balance the overall estimation of the benefit-to-risk ratio in X-ray breast imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>It is expected that a better knowledge about radiation-induced cancer risk among population could improve the communications skills between patients and clinicians and could help to increase the awareness in women about radiation risk perception for a transparent and proper informed choice of imaging exam.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 111784"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2400500X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Conventional mammography remains the primary imaging modality for state-of-the-art breast imaging practice and its benefit (both on diagnostic and screening) was largely reported. In mammography, the typical Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) from X-ray radiation to the breast spans, on average, from 1 to 10 mGy, depending on breast thicknesses, percentage of fibroglandular tissue, and on the examination purpose.

Methods

The aim of this narrative review is to describe the extent of radiation risk in X-ray breast imaging and discuss the main steps and parameters (e.g. MGD, screening frequency and number of examination views) that may have an influence on the radiation risk assessment.

Results

Even though the radiation doses used with these examinations are very low, as compared to other medical or natural radiation exposures, there is a non-negligible associated risk of radiation-induced cancer. Accurate radiation risk assessment permits to better balance the overall estimation of the benefit-to-risk ratio in X-ray breast imaging.

Conclusions

It is expected that a better knowledge about radiation-induced cancer risk among population could improve the communications skills between patients and clinicians and could help to increase the awareness in women about radiation risk perception for a transparent and proper informed choice of imaging exam.
了解乳腺成像中的电离辐射风险:概念和数量、临床重要性和未来方向。
背景:传统的乳腺 X 射线照相术仍然是最先进的乳腺成像实践中的主要成像方式,其优点(诊断和筛查)已被广泛报道。在乳腺 X 射线照相术中,X 射线辐射到乳房的典型平均腺体剂量(MGD)平均为 1 到 10 mGy,具体取决于乳房厚度、纤维腺体组织的百分比以及检查目的:本综述旨在描述 X 射线乳腺成像的辐射风险程度,并讨论可能对辐射风险评估产生影响的主要步骤和参数(如 MGD、筛查频率和检查次数):结果:尽管与其他医疗或自然辐射相比,这些检查使用的辐射剂量非常低,但辐射诱发癌症的相关风险不可忽视。准确的辐射风险评估可以更好地平衡 X 射线乳腺成像的总体效益风险比:预计提高人们对辐射诱发癌症风险的认识,可以改善患者与临床医生之间的沟通技巧,并有助于提高妇女对辐射风险的认识,从而在知情的情况下透明、正确地选择成像检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信