A study of implementation factors for a novel approach to clinical trials: constructs for consideration in the coordination of direct-to-patient online-based medical research.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Peter F Cronholm, Janelle Applequist, Jeffrey Krischer, Ebony Fontenot, Trocon Davis, Cristina Burroughs, Carol A McAlear, Renée Borchin, Joyce Kullman, Simon Carette, Nader Khalidi, Curry Koening, Carol A Langford, Paul Monach, Larry Moreland, Christian Pagnoux, Ulrich Specks, Antoine G Sreih, Steven R Ytterberg, Peter A Merkel
{"title":"A study of implementation factors for a novel approach to clinical trials: constructs for consideration in the coordination of direct-to-patient online-based medical research.","authors":"Peter F Cronholm, Janelle Applequist, Jeffrey Krischer, Ebony Fontenot, Trocon Davis, Cristina Burroughs, Carol A McAlear, Renée Borchin, Joyce Kullman, Simon Carette, Nader Khalidi, Curry Koening, Carol A Langford, Paul Monach, Larry Moreland, Christian Pagnoux, Ulrich Specks, Antoine G Sreih, Steven R Ytterberg, Peter A Merkel","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02352-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional medical research infrastructures relying on the Centers of Excellence (CoE) model (an infrastructure or shared facility providing high standards of research excellence and resources to advance scientific knowledge) are often limited by geographic reach regarding patient accessibility, presenting challenges for study recruitment and accrual. Thus, the development of novel, patient-centered (PC) strategies (e.g., the use of online technologies) to support recruitment and streamline study procedures are necessary. This research focused on an implementation evaluation of a design innovation with implementation outcomes as communicated by study staff and patients for CoE and PC approaches for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for patients with vasculitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 32 individuals (17 study team members, 15 patients). Transcripts were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following CFIR elements emerged: characteristics of the intervention, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process. From the staff perspective, the communication of the PC approach was a major challenge, but should have been used as an opportunity to identify one \"point person\" in charge of all communicative elements among the study team. Study staff from both arms were highly supportive of the PC approach and saw its promise, particularly regarding online consent procedures. Patients reported high self-efficacy in reference to the PC approach and utilization of online technologies. Local physicians were integral for making patients feel comfortable about participation in research studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The complexity of replicating the interpersonal nature of the CoE model in the virtual setting is substantial, meaning the PC approach should be viewed as a hybrid strategy that integrates online and face-to-face practices.</p><p><strong>Trial registrations: </strong>1) Name: The Assessment of Prednisone In Remission Trial - Centers of Excellence Approach (TAPIR).</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01940094 . Date of registration: September 10, 2013. 2) Name: The Assessment of Prednisone In Remission Trial - Patient Centric Approach (TAPIR).</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Clinical Trials.gov NCT01933724 . Date of registration: September 2, 2013.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02352-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional medical research infrastructures relying on the Centers of Excellence (CoE) model (an infrastructure or shared facility providing high standards of research excellence and resources to advance scientific knowledge) are often limited by geographic reach regarding patient accessibility, presenting challenges for study recruitment and accrual. Thus, the development of novel, patient-centered (PC) strategies (e.g., the use of online technologies) to support recruitment and streamline study procedures are necessary. This research focused on an implementation evaluation of a design innovation with implementation outcomes as communicated by study staff and patients for CoE and PC approaches for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) for patients with vasculitis.

Methods: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 32 individuals (17 study team members, 15 patients). Transcripts were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results: The following CFIR elements emerged: characteristics of the intervention, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process. From the staff perspective, the communication of the PC approach was a major challenge, but should have been used as an opportunity to identify one "point person" in charge of all communicative elements among the study team. Study staff from both arms were highly supportive of the PC approach and saw its promise, particularly regarding online consent procedures. Patients reported high self-efficacy in reference to the PC approach and utilization of online technologies. Local physicians were integral for making patients feel comfortable about participation in research studies.

Conclusions: The complexity of replicating the interpersonal nature of the CoE model in the virtual setting is substantial, meaning the PC approach should be viewed as a hybrid strategy that integrates online and face-to-face practices.

Trial registrations: 1) Name: The Assessment of Prednisone In Remission Trial - Centers of Excellence Approach (TAPIR).

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01940094 . Date of registration: September 10, 2013. 2) Name: The Assessment of Prednisone In Remission Trial - Patient Centric Approach (TAPIR).

Trial registration number: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01933724 . Date of registration: September 2, 2013.

临床试验新方法实施因素研究:在协调直接面向患者的在线医学研究时应考虑的构建因素。
背景:传统的医学研究基础设施依赖于卓越中心(CoE)模式(提供高标准的卓越研究和资源以促进科学知识发展的基础设施或共享设施),在患者可及性方面往往受到地理范围的限制,给研究招募和应计带来了挑战。因此,有必要开发新的、以患者为中心(PC)的策略(如使用在线技术)来支持招募和简化研究程序。本研究的重点是对针对脉管炎患者的随机对照试验(RCT)的CoE和PC方法的设计创新与实施结果进行评估:对 32 人(17 名研究团队成员和 15 名患者)进行了深入的定性访谈。采用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)对访谈记录进行编码:结果显示,CFIR 的要素包括:干预措施的特点、内部环境、个人特点和过程。从工作人员的角度来看,PC 方法的沟通是一项重大挑战,但本应该借此机会确定一名 "联络人",负责研究团队中的所有沟通要素。两组研究人员都非常支持 PC 方法,并认为这种方法大有可为,尤其是在在线同意程序方面。患者对 PC 方法和在线技术的使用有很高的自我效能感。当地医生在让患者放心参与研究方面发挥了不可或缺的作用:在虚拟环境中复制 CoE 模式的人际性质非常复杂,这意味着 PC 方法应被视为一种将在线和面对面实践相结合的混合战略:1) 名称:1) 名称:泼尼松缓解试验评估--卓越中心方法(TAPIR).试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01940094 .注册日期:2013 年 9 月 10 日:注册日期:2013 年 9 月 10 日。2) 名称:2) 名称:泼尼松缓解期评估试验--以患者为中心的方法(TAPIR):临床试验.gov NCT01933724 .注册日期:2013 年 9 月 2 日:注册日期:2013 年 9 月 2 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信