Severe and unclassifiable tremor.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1790196
Marcos Serrano-Dueñas
{"title":"Severe and unclassifiable tremor.","authors":"Marcos Serrano-Dueñas","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Patients often exhibit very severe or disabling forms of tremor that cannot be clearly characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To present a series of 37 cases of tremor considered <i>unclassifiable</i>. Patients diagnosed with essential tremor according to criteria of the International Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorder Society (IPDMDS), who had been previously studied, were included as controls. All patients underwent a battery of tests between 2019 and 2022, which enabled us to compare them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Relevant demographic and clinical information were collected. The following tools were applied: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); the Fahn-Tolosa-Marín Tremor Rating Scale (TRS); and the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST). A simple brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed for all patients. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test and the <i>t</i>-test with Fisher correction if appropriate, and the quantitative variables were compared through the two-tailed Student <i>t</i>-test. Values of <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The cases presented higher scores on the anxiety and depression subscales of the HADS than the controls (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.006 and 0.000 respectively). In all domains of the TRS, the cases scored significantly higher, as well as in the QUEST. History of enolism was higher among the controls, and history of orthostasis and rest tremor was higher among the cases (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.000). Cerebellar atrophy was present in every patient in the case group, and in 24 subjects in the control group. Dystonia was observed in 7 subjects in the case group, and in none of the patients in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There are patients with unclassifiable and extremely disabling tremors who respond poorly to the pharmacological therapy options.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"82 10","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Patients often exhibit very severe or disabling forms of tremor that cannot be clearly characterized.

Objective:  To present a series of 37 cases of tremor considered unclassifiable. Patients diagnosed with essential tremor according to criteria of the International Parkinson Disease and Movement Disorder Society (IPDMDS), who had been previously studied, were included as controls. All patients underwent a battery of tests between 2019 and 2022, which enabled us to compare them.

Methods:  Relevant demographic and clinical information were collected. The following tools were applied: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); the Fahn-Tolosa-Marín Tremor Rating Scale (TRS); and the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST). A simple brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed for all patients. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared test and the t-test with Fisher correction if appropriate, and the quantitative variables were compared through the two-tailed Student t-test. Values of p ≤ 0.01 were considered statistically significant.

Results:  The cases presented higher scores on the anxiety and depression subscales of the HADS than the controls (p ≤ 0.006 and 0.000 respectively). In all domains of the TRS, the cases scored significantly higher, as well as in the QUEST. History of enolism was higher among the controls, and history of orthostasis and rest tremor was higher among the cases (p ≤ 0.000). Cerebellar atrophy was present in every patient in the case group, and in 24 subjects in the control group. Dystonia was observed in 7 subjects in the case group, and in none of the patients in the control group.

Conclusion:  There are patients with unclassifiable and extremely disabling tremors who respond poorly to the pharmacological therapy options.

无法分类的严重震颤。
背景:患者常常表现出非常严重或致残性的震颤,但无法明确其特征:介绍一系列 37 例无法分类的震颤病例。根据国际帕金森病和运动障碍协会(IPDMDS)的标准被诊断为本质性震颤的患者作为对照。所有患者都在2019年至2022年期间接受了一系列测试,这使我们能够对他们进行比较:收集了相关的人口统计学和临床信息。我们使用了以下工具:迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、Fahn-Tolosa-Marín震颤评分量表(TRS)和本质性震颤生活质量(QUEST)。所有患者均进行了简单的脑磁共振成像(MRI)扫描。分类变量的比较采用卡方检验(Chi-squared test)和t检验(Fisher correction),定量变量的比较采用双尾学生t检验(Student t-test)。P值≤0.01被认为具有统计学意义:结果:病例在 HADS 焦虑和抑郁分量表上的得分高于对照组(p 分别≤ 0.006 和 0.000)。在TRS的所有领域中,病例的得分都明显高于对照组,在QUEST中也是如此。在对照组中,有脑震荡病史的比例较高,而在病例中,有正位震颤和静止震颤病史的比例较高(P≤0.000)。病例组的每名患者和对照组的 24 名患者都存在小脑萎缩。病例组中有7名患者出现肌张力障碍,而对照组中没有患者出现肌张力障碍:结论:有些患者的震颤无法分类且极度致残,但对药物治疗反应不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信