Cone-beam CT volumetry: a new method for evaluating osteotomy healing - a clinical evaluation and MDCT comparison.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1177/02841851241287903
Ivan Cetinic, Michael Ullman, Linn Hellman, Ylva Aurell
{"title":"Cone-beam CT volumetry: a new method for evaluating osteotomy healing - a clinical evaluation and MDCT comparison.","authors":"Ivan Cetinic, Michael Ullman, Linn Hellman, Ylva Aurell","doi":"10.1177/02841851241287903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fracture healing complications remain a major problem in trauma monitoring. An open wedge osteotomy of the distal radius provides a unique way of evaluating fracture healing. Since the introduction of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at our institution, it has become the method of choice for assessing hand and wrist bones. To date, CT volumetry has been validated for multidetector CT (MDCT) but not for CBCT.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess osteotomy healing using CBCT volumetry and to evaluate two different segmentation techniques.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 36 patients were surgically treated for malunited distal radius fractures with open-wedge osteotomy either leaving the void empty (open wedge empty [OWE]) or filled with bone graft substitutes (BGS). They were scanned using CBCT and MDCT postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Segmentation was performed both manually and semi-automatically for volumetric measurement. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median osteotomy volume in the OWE group postoperatively was 0.87 cm<sup>3</sup> (range=0.42-2.72). At 3 months, all but one of the OWE volumes had diminished to half or less of their initial volume. In the BGS group, the median postoperative volume was 1.30 cm<sup>3</sup> (range=0.73-1.81) and at 12 months, 76% of the initial volume remained. Reliability between CBCT and MDCT volumetry expressed as ICC was ≥0.96. ICC for the two segmentation techniques was ≥0.99 and ICC for inter-observer reliability ≥0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBCT volumetry is a reliable tool and comparable to MDCT to quantify bone healing of an osteotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"1375-1381"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241287903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fracture healing complications remain a major problem in trauma monitoring. An open wedge osteotomy of the distal radius provides a unique way of evaluating fracture healing. Since the introduction of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at our institution, it has become the method of choice for assessing hand and wrist bones. To date, CT volumetry has been validated for multidetector CT (MDCT) but not for CBCT.

Purpose: To assess osteotomy healing using CBCT volumetry and to evaluate two different segmentation techniques.

Material and methods: A total of 36 patients were surgically treated for malunited distal radius fractures with open-wedge osteotomy either leaving the void empty (open wedge empty [OWE]) or filled with bone graft substitutes (BGS). They were scanned using CBCT and MDCT postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Segmentation was performed both manually and semi-automatically for volumetric measurement. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC).

Results: The median osteotomy volume in the OWE group postoperatively was 0.87 cm3 (range=0.42-2.72). At 3 months, all but one of the OWE volumes had diminished to half or less of their initial volume. In the BGS group, the median postoperative volume was 1.30 cm3 (range=0.73-1.81) and at 12 months, 76% of the initial volume remained. Reliability between CBCT and MDCT volumetry expressed as ICC was ≥0.96. ICC for the two segmentation techniques was ≥0.99 and ICC for inter-observer reliability ≥0.97.

Conclusion: CBCT volumetry is a reliable tool and comparable to MDCT to quantify bone healing of an osteotomy.

锥形束 CT 容积测量:评估截骨愈合的新方法--临床评估与 MDCT 比较。
背景:骨折愈合并发症仍然是创伤监测中的一个主要问题。桡骨远端开放性楔形截骨术为评估骨折愈合提供了一种独特的方法。自从我院引进锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)以来,它已成为评估手部和腕部骨骼的首选方法。目的:使用 CBCT 容积测量法评估截骨愈合情况,并评估两种不同的分割技术:共对 36 名桡骨远端畸形骨折患者进行了开楔截骨手术治疗,要么留空(开楔留空 [OWE]),要么用骨移植替代物(BGS)填充。术后以及 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月后,使用 CBCT 和 MDCT 对患者进行扫描。通过手动和半自动方式进行分割,以测量体积。使用类内相关性(ICC)评估观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性:OWE组术后截骨体积的中位数为0.87立方厘米(范围=0.42-2.72)。3 个月后,除一名患者外,所有 OWE 患者的截骨体积均缩小至初始体积的一半或更小。在 BGS 组中,术后体积中位数为 1.30 立方厘米(范围=0.73-1.81),12 个月时,初始体积的 76% 仍然存在。以 ICC 表示的 CBCT 和 MDCT 容积测量的可靠性≥0.96。两种分割技术的 ICC ≥0.99,观察者间可靠性的 ICC ≥0.97:CBCT容积测量是一种可靠的工具,在量化截骨骨愈合方面可与MDCT相媲美。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信