Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Do Not Improve the Recovery After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Mirco Lo Presti, Giuseppe Gianluca Costa, Giuseppe Agrò, Cosimo Vasco, Angelo Boffa, Alessandro Di Martino, Luca Andriolo, Annarita Cenacchi, Stefano Zaffagnini, Giuseppe Filardo
{"title":"Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Do Not Improve the Recovery After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Mirco Lo Presti, Giuseppe Gianluca Costa, Giuseppe Agrò, Cosimo Vasco, Angelo Boffa, Alessandro Di Martino, Luca Andriolo, Annarita Cenacchi, Stefano Zaffagnini, Giuseppe Filardo","doi":"10.1177/03635465241283052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Arthroscopic meniscectomy is one of the most performed surgical procedures in orthopaedics. Different approaches have been proposed to improve patient recovery but with unsatisfactory results. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation has been proposed as a strategy to improve the recovery after meniscectomy.Purpose:To investigate the clinical benefits of an intra-articular PRP injection after meniscectomy, in terms of faster and better patient recovery.Study Design:Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:Ninety patients were randomized into a treatment group, with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy immediately followed by a 5-mL injection of autologous conditioned plasma, and a control group with partial meniscectomy alone. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 180 days of follow-up with the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain (primary outcome), as well as with International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, Tegner score, and EuroQol-Visual Analog Scale score. Objective evaluation was performed analyzing knee range of motion and circumference and the International Knee Documentation Committee objective score. Complications, patient judgment, and satisfaction were documented as well.Results:No major complications and an overall significant improvement in the clinical scores were observed in both groups. Overall, the comparative analysis did not demonstrate significant between-group differences in absolute values or improvements of both subjective and objective scores, as well as activity level. The improvement in terms of VAS pain score for the treatment group was significant already at 15 days (from 4.3 ± 2.5 to 2.5 ± 2.5; P = .014), while in the control group it became significant at 30 days (from 3.7 ± 2.3 to 2.0 ± 2.4; P = .004). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of judgment of treatment results and satisfaction.Conclusion:A single postoperative injection of PRP was not able to significantly improve patient recovery after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. PRP augmentation did not provide overall benefits at a short-term follow-up (6 months) in terms of pain relief, function, objective parameters, and return-to-sport activities.Registration:NCT02872753 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241283052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Arthroscopic meniscectomy is one of the most performed surgical procedures in orthopaedics. Different approaches have been proposed to improve patient recovery but with unsatisfactory results. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) augmentation has been proposed as a strategy to improve the recovery after meniscectomy.Purpose:To investigate the clinical benefits of an intra-articular PRP injection after meniscectomy, in terms of faster and better patient recovery.Study Design:Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:Ninety patients were randomized into a treatment group, with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy immediately followed by a 5-mL injection of autologous conditioned plasma, and a control group with partial meniscectomy alone. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, and 180 days of follow-up with the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain (primary outcome), as well as with International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, Tegner score, and EuroQol-Visual Analog Scale score. Objective evaluation was performed analyzing knee range of motion and circumference and the International Knee Documentation Committee objective score. Complications, patient judgment, and satisfaction were documented as well.Results:No major complications and an overall significant improvement in the clinical scores were observed in both groups. Overall, the comparative analysis did not demonstrate significant between-group differences in absolute values or improvements of both subjective and objective scores, as well as activity level. The improvement in terms of VAS pain score for the treatment group was significant already at 15 days (from 4.3 ± 2.5 to 2.5 ± 2.5; P = .014), while in the control group it became significant at 30 days (from 3.7 ± 2.3 to 2.0 ± 2.4; P = .004). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of judgment of treatment results and satisfaction.Conclusion:A single postoperative injection of PRP was not able to significantly improve patient recovery after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. PRP augmentation did not provide overall benefits at a short-term follow-up (6 months) in terms of pain relief, function, objective parameters, and return-to-sport activities.Registration:NCT02872753 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
富血小板血浆注射不会改善关节镜半月板部分切除术后的恢复:双盲随机对照试验
背景:关节镜下半月板切除术是矫形外科实施最多的手术之一。人们提出了不同的方法来改善患者的恢复情况,但效果并不理想。目的:研究半月板切除术后关节内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)对患者更快更好恢复的临床益处。研究设计:随机对照试验;证据级别:1.方法:将90名患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组在关节镜下进行部分半月板切除术,术后立即注射5毫升自体调节血浆,对照组仅进行部分半月板切除术。患者在基线和随访 15、30、60 和 180 天时接受疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(主要结果)、国际膝关节文献委员会主观评分、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分子量表、Tegner 评分和 EuroQol-Visual Analog Scale 评分的评估。客观评估是通过分析膝关节活动范围和周长以及国际膝关节文献委员会客观评分来进行的。结果:两组患者均未出现重大并发症,临床评分均有显著改善。总体而言,比较分析并未显示出主观和客观评分的绝对值或改善程度以及活动水平在组间存在明显差异。治疗组的 VAS 疼痛评分在 15 天后有显著改善(从 4.3 ± 2.5 降至 2.5 ± 2.5;P = .014),而对照组在 30 天后有显著改善(从 3.7 ± 2.3 降至 2.0 ± 2.4;P = .004)。结论:术后注射一次 PRP 并不能明显改善关节镜半月板部分切除术后患者的恢复情况。在短期随访(6 个月)中,PRP 增量在疼痛缓解、功能、客观参数和恢复运动活动方面并未带来整体效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信