Evaluation of the performance of nursing students taught using online and offline learning models in emergency and critical care nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q2 NURSING

Japan Journal of Nursing Science Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1111/jjns.12628

Jinmei Xu, Lei Qin, Guijuan Liu, Wireen Leila T. Dator, Suding Fei

{"title":"Evaluation of the performance of nursing students taught using online and offline learning models in emergency and critical care nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Jinmei Xu, Lei Qin, Guijuan Liu, Wireen Leila T. Dator, Suding Fei","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The study investigated the outcomes of employing this hybrid method among nursing students engaged in emergency and critical care curricula during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective study examined nursing students enrolled in the nursing program in China between January 2019 and January 2021. Students were divided into two groups: a study group that engaged in hybrid learning and a control group that participated in traditional classroom learning. Both groups received identical learning materials and credit hours. The study group assessed online learning via a platform with broadcasting features, while offline sessions occurred in the classroom. Post-course, groups were compared in knowledge, skill, and homework performance. The study group provided feedback through a reflective questionnaire to pinpoint areas for improvement in their online learning experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis involved 1774 nursing students, with 906 in the study group and 868 int the control group. The study group outperformed in homework, individual, and comprehensive skills. Despite 73.7% of the study group citing distractions from surrounding environment, the majority appreciated online learning (853, 96.8%). Regarding the appropriateness of the course materials, foreign body airway obstruction courses are highly rated (721, 81.8%), while invasive hemodynamic monitoring had the least favorability (149, 16.9%). Additionally, 33.0% (291) favored live broadcasting and interactive video teaching during online classes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The hybrid learning model enhances nursing students' performance in emergency and critical care courses. However, optimization is needed for environmental distraction, specific contents, and communication methods in online learning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.12628","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The study investigated the outcomes of employing this hybrid method among nursing students engaged in emergency and critical care curricula during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A retrospective study examined nursing students enrolled in the nursing program in China between January 2019 and January 2021. Students were divided into two groups: a study group that engaged in hybrid learning and a control group that participated in traditional classroom learning. Both groups received identical learning materials and credit hours. The study group assessed online learning via a platform with broadcasting features, while offline sessions occurred in the classroom. Post-course, groups were compared in knowledge, skill, and homework performance. The study group provided feedback through a reflective questionnaire to pinpoint areas for improvement in their online learning experience.

Results

The analysis involved 1774 nursing students, with 906 in the study group and 868 int the control group. The study group outperformed in homework, individual, and comprehensive skills. Despite 73.7% of the study group citing distractions from surrounding environment, the majority appreciated online learning (853, 96.8%). Regarding the appropriateness of the course materials, foreign body airway obstruction courses are highly rated (721, 81.8%), while invasive hemodynamic monitoring had the least favorability (149, 16.9%). Additionally, 33.0% (291) favored live broadcasting and interactive video teaching during online classes.

Conclusions

The hybrid learning model enhances nursing students' performance in emergency and critical care courses. However, optimization is needed for environmental distraction, specific contents, and communication methods in online learning.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用在线和离线学习模式教授急诊和危重症护理的护理学生的表现

目的该研究调查了在 COVID-19 大流行期间，在急诊和危重症护理课程的护理学生中采用这种混合方法的结果。方法对 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在中国护理专业就读的护理学生进行回顾性研究。学生被分为两组：参与混合学习的研究组和参与传统课堂学习的对照组。两组学生获得的学习材料和学时完全相同。研究组通过具有广播功能的平台进行在线学习评估，而离线课程则在教室进行。课程结束后，两组在知识、技能和作业成绩方面进行了比较。研究小组通过反思问卷提供反馈意见，指出在线学习体验中需要改进的地方。结果分析涉及 1774 名护理专业学生，其中研究组 906 人，对照组 868 人。研究组在家庭作业、个人和综合技能方面表现优异。尽管研究组有 73.7% 的学生提到周围环境会分散他们的注意力，但大多数学生（853 人，96.8%）对在线学习表示赞赏。关于课程材料的适当性，异物气道阻塞课程获得了很高的评价（721 人，81.8%），而侵入性血流动力学监测的支持率最低（149 人，16.9%）。此外，33.0%（291 人）赞成在线课堂上的直播和互动视频教学。结论混合学习模式提高了护理学生在急诊和重症监护课程中的表现。然而，在线学习中的环境干扰、特定内容和交流方式需要优化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Japan Journal of Nursing Science 医学-护理

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.