Risk-stratified management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion based on machine learning

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY
Zhang Lu, Tian Pu, Li Boning, Xu Ling, Qiu Lihua, Bi Zhaori, Chen Limei, Sui Long
{"title":"Risk-stratified management of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion based on machine learning","authors":"Zhang Lu,&nbsp;Tian Pu,&nbsp;Li Boning,&nbsp;Xu Ling,&nbsp;Qiu Lihua,&nbsp;Bi Zhaori,&nbsp;Chen Limei,&nbsp;Sui Long","doi":"10.1002/jmv.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concordance rate between conization and colposcopy-directed biopsy (CDB) proven cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) were 64−85%. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with pathological upgrading or downgrading after conization in patients with cervical HSIL and to provide risk-stratified management based on a machine learning predictive model.</p><p>This retrospective study included patients who visited the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January 1 to December 31, 2019, were diagnosed with cervical HSIL by CDB, and subsequently underwent conization. A wide variety of data were collected from the medical records, including demographic data, laboratory findings, colposcopy descriptions, and pathological results. The patients were categorized into three groups according to their postconization pathological results: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or below (downgrading group), HSIL (HSIL group), and cervical cancer (upgrading group). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for pathological changes in patients with cervical HSIL. Machine learning prediction models were established, evaluated, and subsequently verified using external testing data.</p><p>In total, 1585 patients were included, of whom 65 (4.1%) were upgraded to cervical cancer after conization, 1147 (72.4%) remained having HSIL, and 373 (23.5%) were downgraded to LSIL or below. Multivariate analysis showed a 2% decrease in the incidence of pathological downgrade for each additional year of age and a 1% increase in lesion size. Patients with cytology &gt; LSIL (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21–0.52), human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14–0.81), HPV 33 infection (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18–0.78), coarse punctate vessels on colposcopy examination (OR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06–0.32), HSIL lesions in the endocervical canal (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30–0.76), and HSIL impression (OR = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01–0.03) were less likely to experience pathological downgrading after conization than their counterparts. The independent risk factors for pathological upgrading to cervical cancer after conization included the following: age (OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04–1.12), HPV 16 infection (OR = 4.07; 95% CI, 1.70–9.78), the presence of coarse punctate vessels during colposcopy examination (OR = 2.21; 95% CI, 1.08–4.50), atypical vessels (OR = 6.87; 95% CI, 2.81–16.83), and HSIL lesions in the endocervical canal (OR = 2.91; 95% CI, 1.46–5.77). Among the six machine learning prediction models, the back propagation (BP) neural network model demonstrated the highest and most uniform predictive performance in the downgrading, HSIL, and upgrading groups, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.90, 0.84, and 0.69; sensitivities of 0.74, 0.84, and 0.42; specificities of 0.90, 0.71, and 0.95; and accuracies of 0.74, 0.84, and 0.95, respectively. In the external testing set, the BP neural network model showed a higher predictive performance than the logistic regression model, with an overall AUC of 0.91. Therefore, a web-based prediction tool was developed in this study.</p><p>BP neural network prediction model has excellent predictive performance and can be used for the risk stratification of patients with CDB-diagnosed HSIL.</p>","PeriodicalId":16354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Virology","volume":"96 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmv.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concordance rate between conization and colposcopy-directed biopsy (CDB) proven cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) were 64−85%. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with pathological upgrading or downgrading after conization in patients with cervical HSIL and to provide risk-stratified management based on a machine learning predictive model.

This retrospective study included patients who visited the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January 1 to December 31, 2019, were diagnosed with cervical HSIL by CDB, and subsequently underwent conization. A wide variety of data were collected from the medical records, including demographic data, laboratory findings, colposcopy descriptions, and pathological results. The patients were categorized into three groups according to their postconization pathological results: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or below (downgrading group), HSIL (HSIL group), and cervical cancer (upgrading group). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for pathological changes in patients with cervical HSIL. Machine learning prediction models were established, evaluated, and subsequently verified using external testing data.

In total, 1585 patients were included, of whom 65 (4.1%) were upgraded to cervical cancer after conization, 1147 (72.4%) remained having HSIL, and 373 (23.5%) were downgraded to LSIL or below. Multivariate analysis showed a 2% decrease in the incidence of pathological downgrade for each additional year of age and a 1% increase in lesion size. Patients with cytology > LSIL (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21–0.52), human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14–0.81), HPV 33 infection (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18–0.78), coarse punctate vessels on colposcopy examination (OR = 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06–0.32), HSIL lesions in the endocervical canal (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30–0.76), and HSIL impression (OR = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01–0.03) were less likely to experience pathological downgrading after conization than their counterparts. The independent risk factors for pathological upgrading to cervical cancer after conization included the following: age (OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04–1.12), HPV 16 infection (OR = 4.07; 95% CI, 1.70–9.78), the presence of coarse punctate vessels during colposcopy examination (OR = 2.21; 95% CI, 1.08–4.50), atypical vessels (OR = 6.87; 95% CI, 2.81–16.83), and HSIL lesions in the endocervical canal (OR = 2.91; 95% CI, 1.46–5.77). Among the six machine learning prediction models, the back propagation (BP) neural network model demonstrated the highest and most uniform predictive performance in the downgrading, HSIL, and upgrading groups, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.90, 0.84, and 0.69; sensitivities of 0.74, 0.84, and 0.42; specificities of 0.90, 0.71, and 0.95; and accuracies of 0.74, 0.84, and 0.95, respectively. In the external testing set, the BP neural network model showed a higher predictive performance than the logistic regression model, with an overall AUC of 0.91. Therefore, a web-based prediction tool was developed in this study.

BP neural network prediction model has excellent predictive performance and can be used for the risk stratification of patients with CDB-diagnosed HSIL.

基于机器学习的宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变风险分级管理方法
宫颈锥切术与阴道镜引导活检(CDB)证实的宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的吻合率为64%-85%。本回顾性研究纳入了2019年1月1日至12月31日在复旦大学附属妇产科医院就诊、经CDB确诊为宫颈HSIL并随后接受锥切术的患者。我们从病历中收集了各种数据,包括人口统计学数据、实验室检查结果、阴道镜检查描述和病理结果。根据锥切后的病理结果将患者分为三组:低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)或以下(降级组)、HSIL(HSIL 组)和宫颈癌(升级组)。为确定宫颈 HSIL 患者病理变化的独立风险因素,进行了单变量和多变量分析。共纳入 1585 例患者,其中 65 例(4.1%)在锥切后升级为宫颈癌,1147 例(72.4%)仍为 HSIL,373 例(23.5%)降级为 LSIL 或以下。多变量分析显示,年龄每增加一岁,病理降级的发生率就会降低 2%,病变面积每增加 1%,病理降级的发生率就会增加 1%。细胞学> LSIL(几率比[OR] = 0.33;95% 置信区间[CI],0.21-0.52)、人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染(OR = 0.33;95% CI,0.14-0.81)、HPV 33感染(OR = 0.37;95% CI,0.18-0.78)、阴道镜检查发现粗大点状血管(OR = 0.14;95% CI,0.06-0.32)、宫颈内口HSIL病变(OR = 0.48;95% CI,0.30-0.76)和HSIL印迹(OR = 0.02;95% CI,0.01-0.03)在锥切术后发生病理降级的可能性低于同类患者。78)、阴道镜检查时出现粗大点状血管(OR = 2.21;95% CI,1.08-4.50)、不典型血管(OR = 6.87;95% CI,2.81-16.83)和宫颈管内的 HSIL 病变(OR = 2.91;95% CI,1.46-5.77)。在六种机器学习预测模型中,反向传播(BP)神经网络模型在降级组、HSIL 组和升级组的预测性能最高且最一致,其曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.90、0.84 和 0.69;灵敏度分别为 0.74、0.84 和 0.42;特异性分别为 0.90、0.71 和 0.95;准确度分别为 0.74、0.84 和 0.95。在外部测试集中,BP 神经网络模型的预测性能高于逻辑回归模型,总体 AUC 为 0.91。因此,本研究开发了一种基于网络的预测工具。BP神经网络预测模型具有出色的预测性能,可用于CDB诊断的HSIL患者的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Virology
Journal of Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
777
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Virology focuses on publishing original scientific papers on both basic and applied research related to viruses that affect humans. The journal publishes reports covering a wide range of topics, including the characterization, diagnosis, epidemiology, immunology, and pathogenesis of human virus infections. It also includes studies on virus morphology, genetics, replication, and interactions with host cells. The intended readership of the journal includes virologists, microbiologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, diagnostic laboratory technologists, epidemiologists, hematologists, and cell biologists. The Journal of Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Abstracts in Anthropology (Sage), CABI, AgBiotech News & Information, National Agricultural Library, Biological Abstracts, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, Veterinary Bulletin, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信