Understanding after-market service channel selection for complex product-services supply chains: A game-theoretical approach

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Pengqi Du , Jose M. Framinan , Hongzhuan Chen
{"title":"Understanding after-market service channel selection for complex product-services supply chains: A game-theoretical approach","authors":"Pengqi Du ,&nbsp;Jose M. Framinan ,&nbsp;Hongzhuan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Today, cooperation between an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) of Complex Products and Systems (CoPS) and her multiple Key Component Suppliers (KCSs) is characterized by a strategic partnership where long-term benefits are sought for both parties. Since CoPS after-market service can be provided by the KCS, the OEM, or an MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) party, different after-market service channels can be established. In this paper, we model each of these channels using game theory, compare their main features, and discuss the selection of the optimal after-market service channel. We show that the duration of the after-market service is not influenced by the service channel if the service cost remains constant. If the after-market service costs are equal for all parties, each party would prefer the other to perform the service. In the case of different costs, both the cost of the service and potential market size have the same effect on the OEM’s preference for the after-market service channel as on the CoPS ordered quantities. Furthermore, OEM and KCS after-market service channel preferences depend on market size, and “win-win” situations are discussed for the different channels, along with their impact on the long-term stability of the strategic partnership between KCS and OEM. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is carried out to examine the impact of several key parameters. The results presented in the paper serve to deepen the understanding of complex product-service systems and offer a number of managerial insights to select an appropriate after-market service channel for KCSs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 110630"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224007526","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, cooperation between an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) of Complex Products and Systems (CoPS) and her multiple Key Component Suppliers (KCSs) is characterized by a strategic partnership where long-term benefits are sought for both parties. Since CoPS after-market service can be provided by the KCS, the OEM, or an MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) party, different after-market service channels can be established. In this paper, we model each of these channels using game theory, compare their main features, and discuss the selection of the optimal after-market service channel. We show that the duration of the after-market service is not influenced by the service channel if the service cost remains constant. If the after-market service costs are equal for all parties, each party would prefer the other to perform the service. In the case of different costs, both the cost of the service and potential market size have the same effect on the OEM’s preference for the after-market service channel as on the CoPS ordered quantities. Furthermore, OEM and KCS after-market service channel preferences depend on market size, and “win-win” situations are discussed for the different channels, along with their impact on the long-term stability of the strategic partnership between KCS and OEM. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is carried out to examine the impact of several key parameters. The results presented in the paper serve to deepen the understanding of complex product-service systems and offer a number of managerial insights to select an appropriate after-market service channel for KCSs.
了解复杂产品服务供应链的售后服务渠道选择:博弈论方法
如今,复杂产品和系统(CoPS)的原始设备制造商(OEM)与其多个关键部件供应商(KCS)之间的合作以战略合作伙伴关系为特征,双方都在寻求长期利益。由于 CoPS 的售后服务可以由 KCS、原始设备制造商或 MRO(维护、修理和大修)方提供,因此可以建立不同的售后服务渠道。在本文中,我们利用博弈论建立了这些渠道的模型,比较了它们的主要特点,并讨论了如何选择最佳的售后服务渠道。我们的研究表明,如果服务成本不变,售后服务的持续时间不受服务渠道的影响。如果各方的售后服务成本相同,那么各方都会选择由对方提供服务。在成本不同的情况下,服务成本和潜在市场规模对 OEM 对售后服务渠道的偏好与对 CoPS 订单量的影响相同。此外,原始设备制造商和 KCS 对售后服务渠道的偏好取决于市场规模,并讨论了不同渠道的 "双赢 "情况及其对 KCS 和原始设备制造商之间战略伙伴关系长期稳定性的影响。最后,还进行了敏感性分析,以研究几个关键参数的影响。本文所展示的结果有助于加深对复杂产品服务系统的理解,并为 KCS 选择合适的售后服务渠道提供了一些管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信