Packaging the future: Determinants of use intentions and incentive structures of reusable packaging systems

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
{"title":"Packaging the future: Determinants of use intentions and incentive structures of reusable packaging systems","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing environmental concerns regarding single-use packaging have prompted the introduction of reusable packaging systems. This research examines four systems: “refill on the go” (in-store dispensers), “refill at home” (larger refill packages), “return on the go” (returnable packaging), and “return from home” (subscription service for delivery and pickup). An online survey identified performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and an affective component as significant predictors of consumers’ intentions to use these systems for non-food products. The “refill at home” system was most favored, followed by “refill on the go” and “return on the go”. Hence, consumers prefer larger refill packaging but are also open to in-store refilling or returning. A focus group with retail experts and four Maximum Difference scaling analyses emphasize the need to communicate the environmental benefits of reducing packaging waste and eliminating single-use packaging through these reusable packaging systems. Implications for policymakers, retailers, and manufacturers are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005524","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing environmental concerns regarding single-use packaging have prompted the introduction of reusable packaging systems. This research examines four systems: “refill on the go” (in-store dispensers), “refill at home” (larger refill packages), “return on the go” (returnable packaging), and “return from home” (subscription service for delivery and pickup). An online survey identified performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and an affective component as significant predictors of consumers’ intentions to use these systems for non-food products. The “refill at home” system was most favored, followed by “refill on the go” and “return on the go”. Hence, consumers prefer larger refill packaging but are also open to in-store refilling or returning. A focus group with retail experts and four Maximum Difference scaling analyses emphasize the need to communicate the environmental benefits of reducing packaging waste and eliminating single-use packaging through these reusable packaging systems. Implications for policymakers, retailers, and manufacturers are discussed.
包装未来:可重复使用包装系统的使用意向和激励结构的决定因素
人们对一次性包装的环境问题日益关注,促使可重复使用的包装系统应运而生。本研究考察了四种系统:"随身补充"(店内分装机)、"在家补充"(较大的补充包装)、"随身退回"(可回收包装)和 "在家退回"(送货上门的订购服务)。一项在线调查显示,绩效预期、努力预期、社会影响和情感因素是消费者对非食品产品使用这些系统的意向的重要预测因素。在家补充 "系统最受青睐,其次是 "外出补充 "和 "外出归还"。因此,消费者更喜欢较大的补充装包装,但也愿意在店内补充或退回。与零售专家进行的焦点小组讨论和四项最大差异比例分析强调,有必要宣传通过这些可重复使用包装系统减少包装废弃物和消除一次性包装对环境的益处。讨论了对政策制定者、零售商和制造商的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信