The impact of externalized pancreatic stents in our practice: A comparison of outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in two time periods

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
L. Arias-Espinosa , A. Nordmann-Gomes , A. Zorrilla-Villalobos , A. Vargas-España , F. Malcher , A. Ramírez-Del Val , C. Chan , I. Domínguez-Rosado
{"title":"The impact of externalized pancreatic stents in our practice: A comparison of outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in two time periods","authors":"L. Arias-Espinosa ,&nbsp;A. Nordmann-Gomes ,&nbsp;A. Zorrilla-Villalobos ,&nbsp;A. Vargas-España ,&nbsp;F. Malcher ,&nbsp;A. Ramírez-Del Val ,&nbsp;C. Chan ,&nbsp;I. Domínguez-Rosado","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a severe complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Using an externalized pancreatic stent is a potential mitigation strategy not previously studied in Latin America.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pancreaticoduodenectomies performed in a single center between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical variables were collected with a 90-day follow-up according to stent intervention: externalized stent (ES), internal stent (IS), or no stent. Before and after ES implementation (2016) periods were also compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 237 patients, 77 (32.5 ​%) had an ES, 24 (10.1 ​%) an IS, and 136 (57.4 ​%) none. No difference was found in the overall incidence of POPF. The use of an ES was associated with less type C POPF, despite having an increased risk for fistula development. PD performed after 2016 were also associated with a reduced incidence of type C POPF, surgical reintervention requirement, POPF-associated mortality, and intrahospital stay.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The use of an ES is a low-cost intervention that can mitigate POPF severity in high-risk patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 116004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a severe complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Using an externalized pancreatic stent is a potential mitigation strategy not previously studied in Latin America.

Methods

Pancreaticoduodenectomies performed in a single center between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical variables were collected with a 90-day follow-up according to stent intervention: externalized stent (ES), internal stent (IS), or no stent. Before and after ES implementation (2016) periods were also compared.

Results

Out of 237 patients, 77 (32.5 ​%) had an ES, 24 (10.1 ​%) an IS, and 136 (57.4 ​%) none. No difference was found in the overall incidence of POPF. The use of an ES was associated with less type C POPF, despite having an increased risk for fistula development. PD performed after 2016 were also associated with a reduced incidence of type C POPF, surgical reintervention requirement, POPF-associated mortality, and intrahospital stay.

Conclusions

The use of an ES is a low-cost intervention that can mitigate POPF severity in high-risk patients.

Abstract Image

外置胰腺支架对我们工作的影响:两个时期胰十二指肠切除术后疗效的比较
背景术后胰瘘是胰十二指肠切除术的一种严重并发症。方法 回顾性分析了 2006 年至 2019 年期间在一个中心进行的胰十二指肠切除术。根据支架干预:外置支架(ES)、内置支架(IS)或无支架,收集了随访 90 天的临床变量。结果 在 237 名患者中,77 人(32.5%)使用了 ES,24 人(10.1%)使用了 IS,136 人(57.4%)未使用。在 POPF 的总发病率方面没有发现差异。尽管瘘管发展的风险增加,但使用 ES 与较少的 C 型 POPF 相关。2016 年后进行的 PD 也与 C 型 POPF 发生率、手术再干预要求、POPF 相关死亡率和院内住院时间减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信