Psychometric Evaluation of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey in Brazilian Older People Psychometric Evaluation of MOS-SSS

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Tábatta Renata Pereira de Brito, Lilian Miranda Belineli, Greiciane da Silva Rocha, Ligiana Pires Corona, Carolina Neves Freiria, Celi Macedo Polo, Rogério Donizeti Reis, Daniela Braga Lima, Daniella Pires Nunes, Wanderson Roberto da Silva
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey in Brazilian Older People Psychometric Evaluation of MOS-SSS","authors":"Tábatta Renata Pereira de Brito,&nbsp;Lilian Miranda Belineli,&nbsp;Greiciane da Silva Rocha,&nbsp;Ligiana Pires Corona,&nbsp;Carolina Neves Freiria,&nbsp;Celi Macedo Polo,&nbsp;Rogério Donizeti Reis,&nbsp;Daniela Braga Lima,&nbsp;Daniella Pires Nunes,&nbsp;Wanderson Roberto da Silva","doi":"10.1111/opn.12654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the psychometric properties of different factorial models of the <i>Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey</i> (MOS-SSS) and screen the frequency of social support in older Brazilians.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Methodological study. Five factorial models of the MOS-SSS were tested for their validity and reliability using three Brazilian samples from different locations in the country. The factorial invariance was assessed across locations using multigroup analysis. The global average score was calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1574 older people participated in the study. For all models, there was adequate factorial and convergent validity and good reliability; the discriminant validity was not achieved. Therefore, a second-order hierarchical model was proposed and showed validity, reliability and invariance across samples. In the three Brazilian samples, participants presented high frequency of social support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A second-order hierarchical model was fitted the Brazilian samples, allowing the calculation of the global score of social support, which was high among the participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Practice</h3>\n \n <p>The MOS-SSS assesses social support levels among older individuals in community or clinical settings. Nurses can tailor interventions based on scale outcomes for personalised care for older people.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.12654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the psychometric properties of different factorial models of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) and screen the frequency of social support in older Brazilians.

Method

Methodological study. Five factorial models of the MOS-SSS were tested for their validity and reliability using three Brazilian samples from different locations in the country. The factorial invariance was assessed across locations using multigroup analysis. The global average score was calculated.

Results

A total of 1574 older people participated in the study. For all models, there was adequate factorial and convergent validity and good reliability; the discriminant validity was not achieved. Therefore, a second-order hierarchical model was proposed and showed validity, reliability and invariance across samples. In the three Brazilian samples, participants presented high frequency of social support.

Conclusion

A second-order hierarchical model was fitted the Brazilian samples, allowing the calculation of the global score of social support, which was high among the participants.

Implications for Practice

The MOS-SSS assesses social support levels among older individuals in community or clinical settings. Nurses can tailor interventions based on scale outcomes for personalised care for older people.

巴西老年人医疗结果研究社会支持调查的心理计量评估 MOS-SSS 的心理计量评估
目的 评估医疗结果研究社会支持调查(MOS-SSS)不同因子模型的心理计量特性,并筛查巴西老年人获得社会支持的频率。 方法 研究方法。使用来自巴西不同地区的三个样本对 MOS-SSS 的五个因子模型的有效性和可靠性进行了测试。采用多组分析法对不同地点的因子不变性进行了评估。计算了全球平均得分。 结果 共有 1574 名老年人参与了研究。所有模型都具有充分的因子效度和收敛效度以及良好的可靠性,但没有达到判别效度。因此,我们提出了一个二阶分层模型,该模型在不同样本中都表现出有效性、可靠性和不变性。在巴西的三个样本中,参与者的社会支持频率较高。 结论 在巴西样本中采用了二阶分层模型,从而可以计算出社会支持的总体得分,参与者的得分较高。 实践意义 MOS-SSS 可评估社区或临床环境中老年人的社会支持水平。护士可以根据量表结果为老年人提供个性化护理,从而量身定制干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信